Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
- PMID: 16306992
- DOI: 10.1038/nature04171
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Abstract
The capacity of visual short-term memory is highly limited, maintaining only three to four objects simultaneously. This extreme limitation necessitates efficient mechanisms to select only the most relevant objects from the immediate environment to be represented in memory and to restrict irrelevant items from consuming capacity. Here we report a neurophysiological measure of this memory selection mechanism in humans that gauges an individual's efficiency at excluding irrelevant items from being stored in memory. By examining the moment-by-moment contents of visual memory, we observe that selection efficiency varies substantially across individuals and is strongly predicted by the particular memory capacity of each person. Specifically, high capacity individuals are much more efficient at representing only the relevant items than are low capacity individuals, who inefficiently encode and maintain information about the irrelevant items present in the display. These results provide evidence that under many circumstances low capacity individuals may actually store more information in memory than high capacity individuals. Indeed, this ancillary allocation of memory capacity to irrelevant objects may be a primary source of putative differences in overall storage capacity.
Similar articles
-
Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51. doi: 10.1038/nature02447. Nature. 2004. PMID: 15085132
-
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81. doi: 10.1038/36846. Nature. 1997. PMID: 9384378
-
Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory.Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):103-7. doi: 10.1038/nn2024. Epub 2007 Dec 9. Nat Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18066057
-
Finding a face in the crowd: parallel and serial neural mechanisms of visual selection.Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:147-56. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55009-5. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17027386 Review.
-
Sensory memory for ambiguous vision.Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Aug 4. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008. PMID: 18684661 Review.
Cited by
-
An Investigation on How Inhibition in Cognitive Processing Contributes to Fluid Reasoning.Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020 Aug 24;16(3):176-185. doi: 10.5709/acp-0295-7. eCollection 2020. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32994831 Free PMC article.
-
The frontal eye fields limit the capacity of visual short-term memory in rhesus monkeys.PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059606. Epub 2013 Mar 15. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23555049 Free PMC article.
-
Proactive interference does not meaningfully distort visual working memory capacity estimates in the canonical change detection task.Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 28;3:42. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00042. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22403556 Free PMC article.
-
Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1206-20. doi: 10.1037/a0027389. Epub 2012 Mar 12. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012. PMID: 22409182 Free PMC article.
-
The role of alpha oscillations in deriving and maintaining spatial relations in working memory.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):888-901. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0439-y. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27299431 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical