Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study
- PMID: 16307572
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01168.x
Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study
Abstract
Objectives: To compare interactions between rat calvarial osteoblasts and titanium dental implants with different microstructured surfaces.
Material and methods: Seven commercially available implants were used. Surfaces included plasma-sprayed, grit-blasted and/or acid-etched, smooth-machined and anodised titanium. Two methods were used to compare cell behaviour: (1) A cell-spreading assay in which percentages of cells at four different stages of attachment were identified by scanning electron microscopy and quantified within a 30 min attachment period. (2) Implants were placed in 'pocket culture' within nylon mesh sacs in contact with explanted calvarial bone fragments for 2 and 4 weeks.
Results: Surfaces combining grit blasting and acid etching, of microporous topography, showed significantly enhanced rates of cell spreading in comparison with the others. Differential cell morphology was observed in both suspension assays and pocket cultures. In the latter, cells migrated onto all surfaces. Multicellular layers with extracellular matrix (ECM) were present between the layers and on the material surfaces after 2 weeks. After 4 weeks, cell layers were more consolidated, and microstructures were obscured by layers of cells and ECM. Mineralised tissue was seen in association with ECM on grit-blasted surfaces of rough and smooth microtopography.
Conclusions: The two methods provided complementary information: a rough surface of porous microstructure may enhance the rate of cell spreading. Differentiation and calcification occurred on surfaces of both rough and smooth microstructure.
Similar articles
-
Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Sep-Oct;16(5):627-36. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001. PMID: 11669244
-
In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.J Dent. 2012 Apr;40(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 28. J Dent. 2012. PMID: 22307025
-
Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):667-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005. PMID: 16307573
-
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration.Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):844-54. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025. Epub 2006 Aug 14. Dent Mater. 2007. PMID: 16904738 Review.
-
The initial attachment and subsequent behavior of osteoblastic cells and oral epithelial cells on titanium.Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14(4):537-44. Biomed Mater Eng. 2004. PMID: 15472400 Review.
Cited by
-
Surrounding Tissue Response to Surface-Treated Zirconia Implants.Materials (Basel). 2019 Dec 19;13(1):30. doi: 10.3390/ma13010030. Materials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31861679 Free PMC article.
-
Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study.Cureus. 2023 May 8;15(5):e38731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38731. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37292557 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical and histological evaluation of roughened surface titanium screws fabricated by electron beam melting.PLoS One. 2014 Apr 30;9(4):e96179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096179. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24788866 Free PMC article.
-
Magnesium vs. machined surfaced titanium - osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation.J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Jun;6(3):157-64. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.157. Epub 2014 Jun 24. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014. PMID: 25006378 Free PMC article.
-
Mega-oss and Mega-TCP versus Bio-Oss granules fixed by alginate gel for bone regeneration.BDJ Open. 2020 Aug 11;6:14. doi: 10.1038/s41405-020-0042-8. eCollection 2020. BDJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32821432 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous