Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Nov;20(11):996-1000.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00179.x.

Patients and medical statistics. Interest, confidence, and ability

Steven Woloshin  1 , Lisa M Schwartz, H Gilbert Welch
Affiliations

Patients and medical statistics. Interest, confidence, and ability

Steven Woloshin et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

Background: People are increasingly presented with medical statistics. There are no existing measures to assess their level of interest or confidence in using medical statistics.

Objective: To develop 2 new measures, the STAT-interest and STAT-confidence scales, and assess their reliability and validity.

Design: Survey with retest after approximately 2 weeks.

Subjects: Two hundred and twenty-four people were recruited from advertisements in local newspapers, an outpatient clinic waiting area, and a hospital open house.

Measures: We developed and revised 5 items on interest in medical statistics and 3 on confidence understanding statistics.

Results: Study participants were mostly college graduates (52%); 25% had a high school education or less. The mean age was 53 (range 20 to 84) years. Most paid attention to medical statistics (6% paid no attention). The mean (SD) STAT-interest score was 68 (17) and ranged from 15 to 100. Confidence in using statistics was also high: the mean (SD) STAT-confidence score was 65 (19) and ranged from 11 to 100. STAT-interest and STAT-confidence scores were moderately correlated (r=.36, P<.001). Both scales demonstrated good test-retest repeatability (r=.60, .62, respectively), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.70 and 0.78), and usability (individual item nonresponse ranged from 0% to 1.3%). Scale scores correlated only weakly with scores on a medical data interpretation test (r=.15 and .26, respectively).

Conclusion: The STAT-interest and STAT-confidence scales are usable and reliable. Interest and confidence were only weakly related to the ability to actually use data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Risk assessment tool for estimating 10-y risk of developing hard CHD. Third report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. National cholesterol education program. http://hin.nhlbi.nih.gov/atpiii/calculator.asp?usertype=prof. Accessed August 12, 2004.
    1. Breast cancer risk assessment tool. National Cancer Institute http://bcra.nci.nih.gov/brc/. Accessed August 12, 2004.
    1. Nease RF, Brooks WB. Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the autonomy preference index and the health opinion survey. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:593–600. - PubMed
    1. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz M. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30. - PubMed
    1. Roberts D, Bilderback E. Reliability and validity of a statistics attitude survey. Educ Psychol Meas. 1980;40:235–8.

Publication types