"The stone which the builders rejected...": Delay of reinforcement and response rate on fixed-interval and related schedules
- PMID: 16307848
- DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.08.006
"The stone which the builders rejected...": Delay of reinforcement and response rate on fixed-interval and related schedules
Abstract
The article deals with response rates (mainly running and peak or terminal rates) on simple and on some mixed-FI schedules and explores the idea that these rates are determined by the average delay of reinforcement for responses occurring during the response periods that the schedules generate. The effects of reinforcement delay are assumed to be mediated by a hyperbolic delay of reinforcement gradient. The account predicts that (a) running rates on simple FI schedules should increase with increasing rate of reinforcement, in a manner close to that required by Herrnstein's equation, (b) improving temporal control during acquisition should be associated with increasing running rates, (c) two-valued mixed-FI schedules with equiprobable components should produce complex results, with peak rates sometimes being higher on the longer component schedule, and (d) that effects of reinforcement probability on mixed-FI should affect the response rate at the time of the shorter component only. All these predictions were confirmed by data, although effects in some experiments remain outside the scope of the model. In general, delay of reinforcement as a determinant of response rate on FI and related schedules (rather than temporal control on such schedules) seems a useful starting point for a more thorough analysis of some neglected questions about performance on FI and related schedules.
Similar articles
-
When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components.Behav Processes. 2008 Jan;77(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jun 13. Behav Processes. 2008. PMID: 17628349
-
Multiple-interval timing in rats: Performance on two-valued mixed fixed-interval schedules.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Oct;29(4):277-91. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.277. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003. PMID: 14570516
-
Exposure duration modifies the effects of low level lead of fixed-interval performance.Neurotoxicology. 1990 Fall;11(3):427-41. Neurotoxicology. 1990. PMID: 2284049
-
Improved multiparameter models of drug effects on response rate under multiple variable interval schedules: evidence from rat studies.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Oct;163(3-4):310-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1136-9. Epub 2002 Jun 27. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002. PMID: 12373432 Review.
-
Scalar properties in animal timing: conformity and violations.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Nov;59(11):1875-908. doi: 10.1080/17470210600784649. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006. PMID: 16987779 Review.
Cited by
-
Using rodent data to elucidate dopaminergic mechanisms of ADHD: Implications for human personality.Personal Neurosci. 2024 Jan 31;7:e2. doi: 10.1017/pen.2023.12. eCollection 2024. Personal Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38384667 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impaired timing precision produced by striatal D2 receptor overexpression is mediated by cognitive and motivational deficits.Behav Neurosci. 2009 Aug;123(4):720-30. doi: 10.1037/a0016503. Behav Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19634929 Free PMC article.
-
Adjunctive behaviors are operants.Learn Behav. 2013 Mar;41(1):1-24. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0095-1. Learn Behav. 2013. PMID: 23359373 Review.
-
Interval timing under a behavioral microscope: Dissociating motivational and timing processes in fixed-interval performance.Learn Behav. 2017 Mar;45(1):29-48. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0234-1. Learn Behav. 2017. PMID: 27443193
-
Dorsomedial Striatal Activity Tracks Completion of Behavioral Sequences in Rats.eNeuro. 2021 Nov 18;8(6):ENEURO.0279-21.2021. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0279-21.2021. Print 2021 Nov-Dec. eNeuro. 2021. PMID: 34725103 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources