Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Jul;15(7):1108-17.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0014-7. Epub 2005 Nov 25.

Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24

Karen Petra Weigert et al. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jul.

Abstract

A retrospectively designed long-term follow-up study of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who had completed treatment, of at least 2 years, by means of brace, surgery, or both brace and surgery. This study is to assess the outcome after treatment for AIS by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument 24 (SRS 24). One hundred and eighteen AIS patients (99 females and 19 males), treated at the Aarhus University Hospital from January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1997, were investigated with at least 2 years follow-up at the time of receiving a posted self-administered questionnaire. Forty-four patients were treated with Boston brace (B) only, 41 patients had surgery (S), and 33 patients were treated both with brace and surgery (BS). The Cobb angles of the three treatment groups did not differ significantly after completed treatment. The outcome in terms of the total SRS 24 score was not significantly different among the three groups. B patients had a significantly better general (not treatment related) self-image and higher general activity level than the total group of surgically treated patients, while surgically treated patients scored significantly better in post-treatment self-image and satisfaction. Comparing B with BS we found a significantly higher general activity level in B patients, while the BS group had significantly higher satisfaction. There were no significant differences between BS and S patients in any of the domain scores. All treatment groups scored "fair or better" in all domain scores of the SRS 24 questionnaire, except in post-treatment function, where all groups scored worse than "fair". Improvement of appearance by means of surgical correction increases mean scores for post-treatment self-image and post-treatment satisfaction. Double-treatment by brace and surgery does not appear to jeopardize a good final outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SRS 24 outcome scores (mean domain scores and SD) at least 2 years after completed brace treatment, surgical-, and brace- and surgical treatment for AIS. Significant differences were shown between B versus S in general self-image, general level of activity, post-treatment self-image, and satisfaction; and between B versus BS in general level of activity and satisfaction. *P<0.05

References

    1. Roach JW (1999) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 30:353–365, vii–viii - PubMed
    1. Montgomery F, Willner S. The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Incidence of treatment in 15 cohorts of children born between 1963 and 1977. Spine. 1997;22:772–774. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199704010-00012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehl DK, Morrissy RT. Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. An update on concepts and technique. Clin.Orthop Relat Res. 1988;229:34–43. - PubMed
    1. Montgomery F, Willner S. Prognosis of brace-treated scoliosis. Comparison of the Boston and Milwaukee methods in 244 girls. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60:383–385. - PubMed
    1. Bridwell KH. Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the basics and the controversies. Spine. 1994;19:1095–1100. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms