This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 1992 Jul;37(7):1433-76.

doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/7/001.

Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging

Affiliations

PMID: 1631192
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/7/001

Review

Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging

M S Chesters. Phys Med Biol. 1992 Jul.

. 1992 Jul;37(7):1433-76.

doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/7/001.

Author

Affiliation

¹ Department of Medical Physics, General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

PMID: 1631192
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/7/001

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

[A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images].
Dölken W, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Horwitz AE, Lackner K. Dölken W, et al. Aktuelle Radiol. 1991 Jan;1(1):23-7. Aktuelle Radiol. 1991. PMID: 2018803 German.
Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
Burgess AE. Burgess AE. Semin Nucl Med. 2011 Nov;41(6):419-36. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.06.005. Semin Nucl Med. 2011. PMID: 21978445 Review.
Current understanding of the human visual system and its application to perception of radiologic images.
Ginsburg AP. Ginsburg AP. Invest Radiol. 1988 Nov;23(11):875-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198811000-00017. Invest Radiol. 1988. PMID: 3061976 Review. No abstract available.
Psychophysical aspects in medical illumination techniques.
Giacomuzzi SM, Buchberger W, Peer R, Peer S, Bale R, Perkmann R, Jaschke W. Giacomuzzi SM, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2001;94(1-2):197-9. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2001. PMID: 11487836
Medical image perception.
Kundel HL. Kundel HL. Acad Radiol. 1995 Sep;2 Suppl 2:S108-10. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(12)80044-4. Acad Radiol. 1995. PMID: 9419714 No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Radiation Dose Reduction in Digital Mammography by Deep-Learning Algorithm Image Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study.
Ha SM, Kim HH, Kang E, Seo BK, Choi N, Kim TH, Ku YJ, Ye JC. Ha SM, et al. Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022 Mar;83(2):344-359. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2020.0152. Epub 2021 Dec 11. Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022. PMID: 36237936 Free PMC article.
Optimum tomographic reconstruction parameters for HMPAO brain SPET imaging: a practical approach based on subjective and objective indexes.
Kotzki PO, Mariano-Goulart D, Quiquere M, Lyonnet F, Zanca M, Rossi M. Kotzki PO, et al. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995 Jul;22(7):671-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01254569. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995. PMID: 7498229
Contrast, noise, and blur affect performance and appreciation of digital radiographs.
van Overveld IM. van Overveld IM. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Nov;8(4):168-79. doi: 10.1007/BF03168716. J Digit Imaging. 1995. PMID: 8573626
Model observers for assessment of image quality.
Barrett HH, Yao J, Rolland JP, Myers KJ. Barrett HH, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 1;90(21):9758-65. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9758. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993. PMID: 8234311 Free PMC article.
Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.
Barrett HH, Myers KJ, Hoeschen C, Kupinski MA, Little MP. Barrett HH, et al. Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jan 21;60(2):R1-75. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/R1. Epub 2015 Jan 7. Phys Med Biol. 2015. PMID: 25564960 Free PMC article. Review.

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- IOP Publishing Ltd.
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information