Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL
- PMID: 16315211
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20469
Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL
Abstract
Purpose: To accurately measure T1 and T2 of breast fibroglandular tissue and fat at 1.5T and 3T, and note the partial volume effects of the admixture of fibroglandular tissue and fat on the relaxation rates using an approach termed iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL) imaging.
Materials and methods: T1 and T2 values were measured on the right breasts of five healthy women at 1.5T and 3T. T1 data were collected using two sequences: inversion recovery without IDEAL, and inversion recovery with IDEAL. T2 data were collected using Hahn Echo scans. SNR and CNR analyses were conducted on collected data.
Results: T1 increased for both fat (21%) and glandular tissue (17%) from 1.5T to 3T. Thus, the TR and TI of breast protocols at 3T should be lengthened accordingly. SNR more than doubled for both tissue types from 1.5T to 3T. IDEAL imaging demonstrated the partial volume effects of fat and glandular tissue on measuring relaxation rates of independent tissue types.
Conclusion: With separated fat and water images, more precise measurements can be made for the lipid component in fat, and the water component in fibroglandular tissue.
Similar articles
-
T1- and T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging of the brachial plexus and cervical spine with IDEAL water-fat separation.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(4):825-32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20721. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006. PMID: 16969792
-
Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) of the wrist and finger at 3T: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression images.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Mar;37(3):733-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23795. Epub 2012 Aug 21. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013. PMID: 22911970
-
Comparing average breast fat content results from two different protocols at 1.5T and 3T: can the data be pooled?J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Oct;40(4):890-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24452. Epub 2013 Nov 25. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24989130
-
Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;14(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2005.12.001. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006. PMID: 16530632 Review.
-
MR imaging of the spine at 3T.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;14(1):97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2006.01.005. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006. PMID: 16530638 Review.
Cited by
-
A standard system phantom for magnetic resonance imaging.Magn Reson Med. 2021 Sep;86(3):1194-1211. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28779. Epub 2021 Apr 13. Magn Reson Med. 2021. PMID: 33847012 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 T: a pilot study.Br J Radiol. 2015 May;88(1049):20150021. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150021. Epub 2015 Mar 18. Br J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25785918 Free PMC article.
-
Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and pharmacokinetic modeling considerations in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1313-22. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jul 15. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012. PMID: 22795931 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Enhancement-Constrained Acceleration (ECA) reconstruction-based high temporal resolution breast DCE-MRI.PLoS One. 2023 Jun 15;18(6):e0286123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286123. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37319275 Free PMC article.
-
B1-corrected breast T1 mapping at ultralow field.Magn Reson Med. 2025 Nov;94(5):1900-1912. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30602. Epub 2025 Jun 16. Magn Reson Med. 2025. PMID: 40523085
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical