Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):1996-2017.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00475.x.

Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care

Nicholas G Castle  1 , Julie Brown, Kimberly A Hepner, Ron D Hays
Affiliations
Review

Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care

Nicholas G Castle et al. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To review the existing literature (1980-2003) on survey instruments used to collect data on patients' perceptions of hospital care.

Study design: Eight literature databases were searched (PubMED, MEDLINE Pro, MEDSCAPE, MEDLINEplus, MDX Health, CINAHL, ERIC, and JSTOR). We undertook 51 searches with each of the eight databases, for a total of 408 searches. The abstracts for each of the identified publications were examined to determine their applicability for review.

Methods of analysis: For each instrument used to collect information on patient perceptions of hospital care we provide descriptive information, instrument content, implementation characteristics, and psychometric performance characteristics.

Principal findings: The number of institutional settings and patients used in evaluating patient perceptions of hospital care varied greatly. The majority of survey instruments were administered by mail. Response rates varied widely from very low to relatively high. Most studies provided limited information on the psychometric properties of the instruments.

Conclusions: Our review reveals a diversity of survey instruments used in assessing patient perceptions of hospital care. We conclude that it would be beneficial to use a standardized survey instrument, along with standardization of the sampling, administration protocol, and mode of administration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abramowitz S, Cote AA, Berry E. Analyzing Patient Satisfaction: A Multianalytic Approach. Quality Review Bulletin. 1987;13:122–30. - PubMed
    1. Applebaum RA, Straker JK, Geron SM. Assessing Satisfaction in Health and Long-Term Care: Practical Approaches to Hearing the Voices of Consumers. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2000.
    1. Arnetz JE, Arnetz BB. The Development and Application of a Patient Satisfaction Measurement System for Hospital-Wide Quality Improvement. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 1996;8:555–66. - PubMed
    1. Arah OA, Asbroek GH, Delnoij DM, de Koning JS, Stam P, Poll A, Vriens B, Schmidt P, Klazinga NS. Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the Hospital-Level Consumer Assessment Health Plans Study (CAHPS) Instrument. Health Services Research. 2005 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkley WM, Furse DH. Changing Priorities for Improvement: The Impact of Low Response Rates in Patient Satisfaction. Journal on Quality Improvement. 1996;22:427–33. - PubMed

Publication types