Cost-saving effect of treatment algorithm for chronic anal fissure: a prospective analysis
- PMID: 16332479
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.007
Cost-saving effect of treatment algorithm for chronic anal fissure: a prospective analysis
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine suggests that in the management of chronic anal fissure (CAF), lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is far more effective than medical treatment in lowering the anal sphincter tone and curing the fissure. In the current study, we developed a treatment algorithm from topical nitroglycerin (NTG) to botulinum toxin type A (Botox [BTX]) to LIS and analyzed its cost benefit by calculating the effective and potential costs based on the treatment success and the rate of avoided surgeries. Patients presenting between November 2003 and December 2004 with CAF and symptoms for greater than 3 months were prospectively treated according to a treatment algorithm which started with (1) topical NTG, in case of failure (2) injection of BTX, thus limiting (3) surgery to those who failed both nonsurgical options or at any point chose the surgical approach. Based on the primary end points of fissure healing or surgery, we calculated the true cost (algorithm) and the potential incremental cost (BTX plus surgery or surgery in all patients, respectively). Sixty-seven patients with CAF (25 men and 42 women; median duration of symptoms, 16 weeks) were treated according to the algorithm. NTG alone was successful in fissure healing in 31 of 67 patients (46.2%). Two developed a recurrent fissure and then received BTX as part of the protocol. Of the 36 patients who failed NTG trial, 3 requested surgery; the others were treated with BTX, which was successful in 84.8%. Five patients (15.2%) failed BTX and subsequently required surgery. The overall surgery rate in the whole study group was 11.9%, whereas CAF healed in 88.1% of our patients with medical treatment alone. Cost for NTG is $10; for 100 units BTX, $528; and for outpatient surgery, $1119. The total cost for these 67 patients therefore was $33,252 ($290 for NTG, $20,580 for NTG plus BTX, $3,357 for NTG plus LIS, and $9,025 for NTG plus BTX plus LIS). If all patients had received BTX with a 15% failure rate, the total cost would have been $56,688 (70.3% cost increase). If all patients had undergone surgery as initial/only treatment, the total cost would have been $74,973 (125% cost increase). Our treatment algorithm for CAF with stepwise escalation can avoid surgery in 88% of the patients. It is highly cost-efficient and resulted in savings of 41% (compared with BTX plus LIS) and up to 70% (compared with surgery in all patients), respectively.
Comment in
-
Cost-saving effect of treatment algorithm for chronic anal fissure: a prospective analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;10(8):1186-7; author reply 1187. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.03.009. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006. PMID: 16966040 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of management algorithm for reducing need for sphincterotomy in chronic anal fissures.Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):760-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02736.x. Colorectal Dis. 2012. PMID: 21801296
-
Conservative and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: prospective longer term results.J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 May;14(5):773-80. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1154-6. Epub 2010 Mar 2. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010. PMID: 20195915
-
Medical and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: a prospective study.J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1541-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0255-3. Epub 2007 Aug 31. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007. PMID: 17763918 Clinical Trial.
-
Botulinum toxin vs glyceryltrinitrate for the medical management of chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis.Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jul;10(6):541-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01387.x. Epub 2007 Sep 13. Colorectal Dis. 2008. PMID: 17868403
-
Novel options for the pharmacological treatment of chronic anal fissure--role of botulin toxin.Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jan;4(1):47-52. doi: 10.2174/157488409787236083. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19149501 Review.
Cited by
-
The epidemiology and treatment of anal fissures in a population-based cohort.BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 16;14:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-129. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25027411 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-saving effect of treatment algorithm for chronic anal fissure: a prospective analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;10(8):1186-7; author reply 1187. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.03.009. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006. PMID: 16966040 No abstract available.
-
Identifying the best therapy for chronic anal fissure.World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr 6;2(2):9-16. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i2.9. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2011. PMID: 21577312 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for the effectiveness of conservative treatment in chronic anal fissure patients using anorectal manometry.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;25(5):649-54. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0885-x. Epub 2010 Feb 3. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010. PMID: 20127340 Clinical Trial.
-
The management of patients with primary chronic anal fissure: a position paper.Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Jun;15(2):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0683-7. Epub 2011 May 3. Tech Coloproctol. 2011. PMID: 21538013 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources