Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;21(2):123-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00297.x. Epub 2005 Dec 7.

A time to be promoted. The Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia (Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia)

Brent W Beasley  1 , Stephen D Simon, Scott M Wright
Affiliations

A time to be promoted. The Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia (Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia)

Brent W Beasley et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: The study's objectives were to determine (1) the rate at which department of medicine faculty in the United States are promoted, (2) if clinician-educators (CEs) are promoted to Associate Professor at the same rate as clinician-investigators (CIs), and (3) the variables that predict promotion.

Methods: The Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia was a part-retrospective, part-prospective (from 2000 to 2003) cohort study. Six-hundred and four Internal Medicine junior faculty across the United States who had been registered as new appointees with the Association of American Medical Colleges in 1995 were invited to participate. Twenty-one percent of these had already left their institution when the study began. One hundred and eighty-three Internal Medicine faculty from 87 institutions in 35 states enrolled. The main outcome measure was the time from appointment as Assistant Professor to promotion to Associate Professor.

Results: Follow-up was complete for all 183 faculty. Among the faculty that achieved promotion, the estimated median time to promotion was 6.0 years (95% Conf. Int.=5.8 to 6.2). The unadjusted sixth-year promotion rate for CEs was 16%, while for CIs it was 26% (P=.002). Independent negative predictors of promotion included low amount of research time (Hazard Ratio [HR] =0.3, 95% Conf. Int.=0.2 to 0.5), having a manuscript review service (HR=0.4, 95% Conf. Int.=0.2 to 0.7), never meeting with Chairman/Chief about promotion (HR=0.4, 95% Conf. Int.=0.2 to 0.7), low job satisfaction (HR=0.5, 95% Conf. Int.=0.3 to 0.9), and working in the Northeast (HR=0.6, 95% Conf. Int.=0.4 to 1.1). Positive predictors included making between 130 dollars and 149,000 dollars per year (HR=1.9, 95% Conf. Int.=1.1 to 3.4), working more than 60 h/wk (HR=1.9, 95% Conf. Int.=1.1 to 3.0), having a career mentor available (HR=1.8, 95% Conf. Int.=1.1 to 2.9), and having access to a grant office (HR=1.6, 95% Conf. Int.=1.0 to 2.6).

Conclusion: CEs and CIs appear to be promoted at different rates. The characteristics that are independently associated with earlier promotion may be helpful for institutions and individual faculty that are committed to achieving promotion efficiently.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of faculty recruitment into Prospective Study of Promotion in Academia study and follow-up.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan-Meier graph demonstrating the promotion rate of clinician-investigators and clinician-educators.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating the ability of the number of publications to predict promotion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jones RF, Gold JS. Faculty appointment and tenure policies in medical schools: a 1997 status report. Acad Med. 1998;73:212–9. - PubMed
    1. Tierney WG. The end of medical tenure as we know it? Academe. 1999;85:39–42.
    1. Thomas PA, Diener-West M, Canto MI, Martin DR, Post WS, Streiff MB. Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2004;79:258–64. - PubMed
    1. Stossel TA. Volume: papers and academic promotion. Ann Intern Med. 1991;106:146–8. - PubMed
    1. Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancosco J, Jr, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada: a survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA. 1997;278:723–8. - PubMed

Publication types