ALARMED: adverse events in low-risk patients with chest pain receiving continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in the emergency department. A pilot study
- PMID: 16338512
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.05.015
ALARMED: adverse events in low-risk patients with chest pain receiving continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in the emergency department. A pilot study
Abstract
Objectives: Current guidelines suggest that most patients who present to an emergency department (ED) with chest pain should be placed on a continuous electrocardiographic monitoring (CEM) device. We evaluated the utility of CEM in ED patients with chest pain.
Methods: We enrolled stable patients who presented to a single ED with chest pain suspected to be ischemic in origin and who were placed on CEM. Patients were classified according to risk of poor outcome using 3 published stratification tools. Trained observers prospectively recorded number of monitored hours, alarms, changes in management, and monitor-detected adverse events (AEs). The primary outcome measure was the rate of AEs detected by CEM. Secondary outcome measures were the rate of alarms that resulted in a change in management and number of false alarms.
Results: We enrolled 72 patients, 56% of whom were categorized as very low-risk by Goldman risk criteria. During 371 monitored hours, we recorded 1762 alarms or 4.7 alarms per monitored hour. There were 11 AEs (0.68%; 95% CI, 0.35%-1.2%), 3 of which resulted in a change in management (0.2%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.5%). Seven AEs were bradydysrhythmias with a heart rate of 45 or higher; the eighth patient had no change in symptoms and was given atropine for a heart rate of 32. The other 3 AEs were an untreated supraventricular tachycardia, a brief sinus pause that triggered a rate change in intravenous nitroglycerin by the patient's nurse, and a run of premature ventricular contractions after which heparin was administered. None of the 3 patients with a change in management was categorized as the lowest-risk.
Conclusions: Routine CEM in low-risk ED patients with chest pain results in an excessive number of alarms, most of which require no change in management. In these patients, the benefit of CEM may be limited, and given that 99.4% of alarms were false, current CEM technology needs to be improved.
Similar articles
-
Wireless cardiac event alert monitoring is feasible and effective in the emergency department and adjacent waiting areas.Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2009 Mar;8(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181980f8b. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19258832
-
Continuous 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring in an emergency department chest pain unit: an assessment of potential clinical effect.Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):342-51. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.78. Ann Emerg Med. 2003. PMID: 12605201 Clinical Trial.
-
Telemetry monitoring during transport of low-risk chest pain patients from the emergency department: is it necessary?Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):965-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.007. Acad Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 16204140
-
Usefulness of exercise test in selected patients coming to the emergency department for acute chest pain.Ital Heart J. 2003 Feb;4(2):92-8. Ital Heart J. 2003. PMID: 12762271 Review.
-
Evaluation and management of the patient who has cocaine-associated chest pain.Cardiol Clin. 2006 Feb;24(1):103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2005.09.003. Cardiol Clin. 2006. PMID: 16326260 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility and Usability of Patch-based Continuous Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in Comparison with Traditional Telemetry in Noncritically Ill Hospitalized Patients.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 Sep 15;10(9):3803-3808. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100901. eCollection 2019 Sep. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019. PMID: 32477749 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment Of Ambient-Noise Exposure Among Female Nurses In Surgical Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Dec 5;12:1007-1011. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S222801. eCollection 2019. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019. PMID: 31824167 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Large Clinical Datasets From Physiologic Monitors in Improving the Safety of Clinical Alarm Systems and Methodological Considerations: A Case From Philips Monitors.JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Sep 30;3(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6427. JMIR Hum Factors. 2016. PMID: 27694097 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of a Targeted Electronic Health Record Intervention to Reduce Telemetry Duration: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):11-15. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5859. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30535345 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Using a Medical Intranet of Things System to Prevent Bed Falls in an Acute Care Hospital: A Pilot Study.J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 4;19(5):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7131. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28473306 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical