Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Dec;12(12):1353-7.
doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1353-1357.2005.

Computer-assisted pattern recognition of autoantibody results

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Computer-assisted pattern recognition of autoantibody results

Steven R Binder et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Immunoassay-based anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) screens are increasingly used in the initial evaluation of autoimmune disorders, but these tests offer no "pattern information" comparable to the information from indirect fluorescence assay-based screens. Thus, there is no indication of "next steps" when a positive result is obtained. To improve the utility of immunoassay-based ANA screening, we evaluated a new method that combines a multiplex immunoassay with a k nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithm for computer-assisted pattern recognition. We assembled a training set, consisting of 1,152 sera from patients with various rheumatic diseases and non-diseased patients. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex method and algorithm were evaluated with a test set that consisted of 173 sera collected at a rheumatology clinic from patients diagnosed by using standard criteria, as well as 152 age- and sex-matched sera from presumably healthy individuals (sera collected at a blood bank). The test set was also evaluated with a HEp-2 cell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Both the ELISA and multiplex immunoassay results were positive for 94% of the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. The kNN algorithm correctly proposed an SLE pattern for 84% of the antibody-positive SLE patients. For patients with no connective tissue disease, the multiplex method found fewer positive results than the ELISA screen, and no disease was proposed by the kNN algorithm for most of these patients. In conclusion, the automated algorithm could identify SLE patterns and may be useful in the identification of patients who would benefit from early referral to a specialist, as well as patients who do not require further evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnett, F. C., S. M. Edworthy, D. A. Bloch, D. J. McShane, J. F. Fries, N. S. Cooper, L. A. Healey, S. R. Kaplan, M. H. Liang, and H. S. Luthra. 1988. The American Rheumatology Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 31:315-324. - PubMed
    1. Astion, M. L., M. H. Wener, R. G. Thomas, G. G. Hunder, and D. A. Bloch. 1994. Application of neural networks to the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 37:760-770. - PubMed
    1. Athreya, B. H., M. L. Cheh, and L. C. Kingsland III. 1998. Computer-assisted diagnosis of pediatric rheumatic diseases. Pediatrics 102:1-7. - PubMed
    1. Breneman, J. R., III. 1992. Histone H1 distribution in chromatin and chromosomes. Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Davis.
    1. Burlingame, R. W., and R. L. Rubin. 1990. Subnucleosome structures as substrates in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J. Immunol. Methods 134:187-199. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances