Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1984 Apr;47(4):780-7.
doi: 10.1128/aem.47.4.780-787.1984.

Microbial growth modification by compressed gases and hydrostatic pressure

Affiliations

Microbial growth modification by compressed gases and hydrostatic pressure

S R Thom et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Apr.

Abstract

Studies of the growth-modifying actions for Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Tetrahymena thermophila of helium, nitrogen, argon, krypton, xenon, and nitrous oxide led to the conclusion that there are two definable classes of gases. Class 1 gases, including He, N(2), and Ar, are not growth inhibitors; in fact, they can reverse the growth inhibitory action of hydrostatic pressures. Class 2 gases, including Kr, Xe, and N(2)O, are potent growth inhibitors at low pressures. For example, at 24 degrees C, 50% growth-inhibitory pressures of N(2)O were found to be ca. 1.7 MPa for E. coli, 1.0 MPa for S. cerevisiae, and 0.5 MPa for T. thermophila. Class 1 gases could act as potentiators for growth inhibition by N(2)O, O(2), Kr, or Xe. Hydrostatic pressure alone is known to reverse N(2)O inhibition of growth, but we found that it did not greatly alter oxygen toxicity. Therefore, potentiation by class 1 gases appeared to be a gas effect rather than a pressure effect. The temperature profile for growth inhibition of S. cerevisiae by N(2)O revealed an optimal temperature for cell resistance of ca. 24 degrees C, with lower resistance at higher and lower temperatures. Overall, it appeared that microbial growth modification by hyperbaric gases could not be related to their narcotic actions but reflected definably different physiological actions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Appl Bacteriol. 1978 Oct;45(2):279-85 - PubMed
    1. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1982;72(2):405-14 - PubMed
    1. J Cell Physiol. 1951 Feb;37(1):15-25 - PubMed
    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1978 Nov;191(1):375-84 - PubMed
    1. J Cell Physiol. 1975 Jun;85(3):511-28 - PubMed