Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Jun;49(6):1482-7.
doi: 10.1128/aem.49.6.1482-1487.1985.

Separation and purification of bacteria from soil

Affiliations

Separation and purification of bacteria from soil

L R Bakken. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jun.

Abstract

Bacteria were released and separated from soil by a simple blending-centrifugation procedure. The percent yield of bacterial cells (microscopic counts) in the supernatants varied over a wide range depending on the soil type. The superantants contained large amounts of noncellular organic material and clay particles. Further purification of the bacterial cells was obtained by centrifugation in density gradients, whereby the clay particles and part of the organic materials sedimented. A large proportion of the bacteria also sedimented through the density gradient, showing that they had a buoyant density above 1.2 g/ml. Attachment to clay minerals and humic material may account for this apparently high buoyant density. The percent yield of cells was negatively correlated with the clay content of the soils, whereas the purity was positively correlated with it. The cell size distribution and the relative frequency of colony-forming cells were similar in the soil homogenate, the supernatants after blending-centrifugation, and the purified bacterial fraction. In purified bacterial fraction from a clay loam, the microscopically measured biomass could account for 20 to 25% of the total C and 30 to 40% of the total N as cellular C and N. The amount of cellular C and N may be higher, however, owing to an underestimation of the cell diameter during fluorescence. A part of the contamination could be ascribed to extracellular structures as well as partly decayed cells, which were not revealed by fluorescence microscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1977;43(1):73-87 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1225-8 - PubMed
    1. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg. 1968 Jul;122(4):357-85 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Apr;45(4):1188-95 - PubMed
    1. Methods Cell Biol. 1975;10:85-104 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources