Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Mar;51(3):580-7.
doi: 10.1128/aem.51.3.580-587.1986.

Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects

Affiliations

Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects

Z Isa et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Mar.

Abstract

In the high-rate anaerobic reactors studied (ca. 10 g of chemical oxygen demand [COD] removed per liter of reactor per day), the sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) were poor competitors of methane-producing bacteria (MPB), scavenging only on the order of 10 to 20% of the total electron flow. The relatively noncompetitive nature of the SRB in this type of reactor is in sharp contrast to the tendency of the SRB to dominate in natural environments and in other types of anaerobic digesters. Various factors such as the feedback inhibition of H(2)S on the SRB, iron limitation, the origin of the SRB inocula, biokinetics, and thermodynamics were investigated. The outcome of the SRB-MPB competition under the reactor conditions studied appeared to be particularly determined by two factors. The SRB, as predicted by the V(max)-K(m) kinetics, competed most effectively at low substrate levels (<0.5 g of COD per liter). The MPB, however, appeared to colonize and adhere much more effectively to the polyurethane carrier matrix present in the reactor, thus compensating for the apparent lower growth rates. Even if the reactor was initially allowed to be predominantly colonized by SRB, the MPB could regain dominance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Appl Bacteriol. 1979 Aug;47(1):153-9 - PubMed
    1. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1974;40(2):285-95 - PubMed
    1. Arch Microbiol. 1981 Jul;129(5):395-400 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jan;45(1):187-92 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Mar;51(3):572-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources