Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Feb;53(2):309-14.
doi: 10.1128/aem.53.2.309-314.1987.

Selection of Protease-Positive and Protease-Negative Variants of Streptococcus cremoris

Affiliations

Selection of Protease-Positive and Protease-Negative Variants of Streptococcus cremoris

J Hugenholtz et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Feb.

Abstract

Protease-negative variants were shown to outcompete the wild-type strains of Streptococcus cremoris E(8), HP, and Wg(2) at pH values higher than 6.0 in milk. For S. cremoris E(8) this process was studied in more detail. At lower pH values the wild type had a selective advantage. This pH-dependent selection was not found in all media tested. The poor growth of the protease-negative variant at low pH was not due to lower internal pH values. By growing S. cremoris E(8) and Wg(2) in acidified milk (pH 5.9) the proteolytic activity of the cultures could be stabilized. In continuous cultures under amino acid limitation the wild type S. cremoris E(8) and HP strains had a selective advantage over the protease-negative variants at low dilution rates (D < 0.2) at all pH values of the medium. This was apparently due to a lower affinity-constant (K(s)) of the protease-positive variants for amino acids. Finally, a high fraction of protease-positive variants could be maintained in continuous cultures by using a growth medium with low concentrations of casein as a nitrogen source. At high dilution rates nearly all cells were protease positive.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jan 10;260(1):72-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Biochem. 1980 May;106(2):431-7 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1272-7 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jan;53(1):149-55 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Dec;48(6):1105-10 - PubMed