Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Mar;56(3):719-23.
doi: 10.1128/aem.56.3.719-723.1990.

Inhibition of the fermentation of propionate to methane by hydrogen, acetate, and propionate

Affiliations

Inhibition of the fermentation of propionate to methane by hydrogen, acetate, and propionate

S Fukuzaki et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Mar.

Abstract

Inhibition of the fermentation of propionate to methane and carbon dioxide by hydrogen, acetate, and propionate was analyzed with a mesophilic propionate-acclimatized sludge that consisted of numerous flocs (size, 150 to 300 mum). The acclimatized sludge could convert propionate to methane and carbon dioxide stoichiometrically without accumulating hydrogen and acetate in a propionate-minimal medium. Inhibition of propionate utilization by propionate could be analyzed by a second-order substrate inhibition model (shown below) given that the substrate saturation constant, K(s), was 15.9 muM; the substrate inhibition constant, K(i), was 0.79 mM; and the maximum specific rate of propionate utilization, q(m), was 2.15 mmol/g of mixed-liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) per day: q(s) = q(m)S/[K(s) + S + (S/K(i))], where q(s) is the specific rate of propionate utilization and S is the initial concentration of undissociated propionic acid. For inhibition by hydrogen and acetate to propionate utilization, a noncompetitive product inhibition model was used: q(s) = q(m)/[1 + (P/K(p))], where P is the initial concentration of hydrogen or undissociated acetic acid and K(p) is the inhibition constant. Kinetic analysis gave, for hydrogen inhibition, K(p(H(2))) = 0.11 atm (= 11.1 kPa, 71.5 muM), q(m) = 2.40 mmol/g of MLVSS per day, and n = 1.51 and, for acetate inhibition, K(p(HAc)) = 48.6 muM, q(m) = 1.85 mmol/g of MLVSS per day, and n = 0.96. It could be concluded that the increase in undissociated propionic acid concentration was a key factor in inhibition of propionate utilization and that hydrogen and acetate cooperatively inhibited propionate degradation, suggesting that hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens might play an important role in enhancing propionate degradation to methane and carbon dioxide.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jul;36(1):1-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1324-8 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1974 May;27(5):985-7 - PubMed
    1. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1970 Sep;12(5):679-712 - PubMed
    1. Arch Mikrobiol. 1967;59(1):20-31 - PubMed