Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Dec;24(12):1514-7.

[Comparison of treatment efficacy of the second and the third generations of chemoradiotherapy regimens containing platinum on advanced non-small cell lung cancer]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 16351804
Comparative Study

[Comparison of treatment efficacy of the second and the third generations of chemoradiotherapy regimens containing platinum on advanced non-small cell lung cancer]

[Article in Chinese]
Yi-Ming Wang et al. Ai Zheng. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Background & objective: Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens are better than other regimens when treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The third generation of platinum-based regimens {NP [Navelbine (NVB), cisplatin (DDP)], TP (Taxol, DDP), GP (Gemzar, DDP)} is better than the second generation {MVP [mitomycin (MMC), desacetylvinblastin amide (VDS), DDP], MIP [MMC, ifosfamide (IFO), DDP], EP [etopside (VP-16), DDP], VDS+DDP}. This study was to compare the efficacy between the second and the third generations of platinum-based regimens combined with radiotherapy on advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: From Jul. 1999 to Dec. 2001, 47 pathologically confirmed advanced NSCLC patients received chemoradiotherapy: 24 received the second generation of platinum-based regimens, 23 received the third generation; all patients received routine external irradiation of (60)Co (65-76 Gy). Characteristics of the patients were comparable. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival rates, and log-rank test to study differences between the 2 groups.

Results: The objective response rates were 41.7% in the second generation group, and 56.5% in the third generation group (Chi (2)=0.53, P=0.47). The median time to progression and median survival time were significantly longer in the third generation group than in the second generation group (12.6 months vs. 6.0 months, Chi(2)=6.93, P=0.01; 14.0 months vs. 9.0 months, Z=-2.17, P=0.03). The 1-, and 2-year survival rates were significantly higher in the third generation group than in the second generation group (56.3% vs. 30.7%, 15.6% vs. 0%, Chi(2)=6.59, P=0.01). The major adverse events were leukocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, radiation-induced esophagitis and pneumonia, which were tolerable.

Conclusions: The third generation of platinum-based regimens in combination with radiotherapy for advanced non-small lung cancer may be more advantageous over the second generation of platinum-based regimens in prolonging survival of advanced NSCLC patients, which would be worth being studied further.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms