Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan 21;332(7534):146-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38678.681840.68. Epub 2005 Dec 13.

Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study

Cate Wallace  1 , Julie Leask, Lyndal J Trevena
Affiliations

Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study

Cate Wallace et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether an evidence based decision aid on the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine changed parents' attitudes towards vaccination.

Design: Before and after study.

Setting: Website promoted through search engines and online parenting and health websites.

Participants: 158 people completing online questions out of 1277 who accessed the website.

Intervention: Evidence based decision aid with text and graphical representation of the possible outcomes of measles, mumps, and rubella diseases compared with MMR vaccination.

Main outcome measures: Attitudes towards MMR vaccination.

Results: Significantly more participants indicated they were "leaning towards" vaccination after using the decision aid (39% before v 55% after, P < 0.001). Compared with those who were undecided or "leaning away from" vaccination after using the decision aid, participants "leaning towards" it were more likely to strongly value its potential to protect their children from the serious side effects of disease (98% v 84%) and other children who could not be vaccinated for medical reasons (68% v 25%). Participants with an unfavourable attitude to vaccination were more likely to be very concerned about the rare side effects of vaccination (78% v 57%), have residual concerns about autism and bowel disease (78% v 27%), and anticipate guilt should their child have an adverse reaction (77% v 50%). Those with a positive attitude to vaccination after using the decision aid were also more likely to feel well informed (83% v 48%).

Conclusions: A web based decision aid significantly improved parental attitudes to MMR vaccination. Residual concerns about autism and bowel disease and the rare chance of serious complications remained as attitudinal barriers to some parents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Screen from MMR vaccination decision aid: direction of leaning about vaccination
Fig 2
Fig 2
Screen from MMR vaccination decision aid: comparison of risks
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. COVER Programme: April to June 2004. Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly [serial online] 2004; 14.
    1. Payne D. Ireland's measles outbreak kills two. BMJ 2000;321: 197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raithatha N, Holland R, Gerrard S, Harvey I. A qualitative investigation of vaccine risk perception amongst parents who immunize their children: a matter of public health concern. J Public Health Med 2003;25: 161-4. - PubMed
    1. Guillaume LR, Bath PA. The impact of health scares on parents' information needs and preferred information sources: a case study of the MMR vaccine scare. Health Informatics Journal 2004;10: 5-22.
    1. Sporton RK, Francis S-A. Choosing not to immunize: are parents making informed decisions? Fam Pract 2001;18: 181-8. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances