Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Oct 5;7(2):E475-87.
doi: 10.1208/aapsj070248.

Population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: issues in design and analysis

Affiliations
Review

Population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: issues in design and analysis

Bernd Meibohm et al. AAPS J. .

Abstract

The current review addresses the following 3 frequently encountered challenges in the design and analysis of population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: (1) body size adjustments during the development of pharmacostatistical models, (2) design and validation of limited sampling strategies, and (3) the integration of historical priors in data analysis and trial simulation. Size adjustments with empiric approaches based on body weight or body surface area have frequently proven as a pragmatic tool to overcome large size differences in a pediatric study population. Allometric size adjustments, however, provide a more mechanistic, physiologically based approach that, if used a priori, allows delineation of the effect of size from that of other covariates that show a high degree of collinearity. The frequent lack of dense data sets in pediatric clinical pharmacology because of ethical and logistic constraints in study design can be overcome with the application of D-optimality-based limited sampling schemes in combination with Bayesian and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approaches. Empirically based dose selection and clinical trial designs for pediatric clinical pharmacology studies can be improved by applying clinical trial simulation techniques, especially if they integrate adult and pediatric in vitro and/or in vivo data as historic priors. Although integration of these concepts and techniques in population pharmacokinetic analyses is not only limited to pediatric research, their application allows researchers to overcome some major hurdles frequently encountered in pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics and, thus, provides the basis for additional clinical pharmacology research in this previously insufficiently studied fraction of the general population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grasela TH, Sheiner LB, Rambeck B, et al. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of phenytoin from routinely collected patient data. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1983;8:355–364. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198308040-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grasela TH, Donn SM. Neonatal population pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital derived from routine clinical data. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1985;8:374–383. - PubMed
    1. Kelman AW, Thomson AH, Whiting B, et al. Estimation of gentamicin elearance and volume of distribution in neonates and young children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;18:685–692. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts R, Rodriguez W, Murphy D, Crescenzi T. Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies. JAMA. 2003;290:905–911. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.905. - DOI - PubMed
    1. General Considerations for Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Studies for Drugs and Biological Products—Draft Guidance. Rockville: Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 1998.

Publication types