Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Oct 7;7(3):E544-59.
doi: 10.1208/aapsj070355.

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: role of modeling and simulation

Affiliations
Review

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: role of modeling and simulation

Jenny Y Chien et al. AAPS J. .

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling and simulation (M&S) are well-recognized powerful tools that enable effective implementation of the learn-and-confirm paradigm in drug development. The impact of PK/PD M&S on decision making and drug development risk management is dependent on the question being asked and on the availability and quality of data accessible at a particular stage of drug development. For instance, M&S methodologies can be used to capture uncertainty and use the expected variability in PK/PD data generated in preclinical species for projection of the plausible range of clinical dose; clinical trial simulation can be used to forecast the probability of achieving a target response in patients based on information obtained in early phases of development. Framing the right question and capturing the key assumptions are critical components of the "learn-and-confirm" paradigm in the drug development process and are essential to delivering high-value PK/PD M&S results. Selected works of PK/PD modeling and simulation from preclinical to phase III are presented as case examples in this article.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997;61:275–291. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(97)90160-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kimko HC, Duffull SB, editors. Simulation for Designing Clinical Trials. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.
    1. Peck CC, Barr WH, Benet LZ, et al. Opportunities for integration of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicokinetics in rational drug development. J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;34:111–119. - PubMed
    1. Galluppi GR, Rogge MC, Roskos LK, et al. Integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in the discovery, development, and review of protein therapeutic agents: a conference report. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:387–399. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.115455. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lesko LJ, Rowland M, Peck CC, Blaschke TF. Optimizing the science of drug development: opportunities for better candidate selection and accelerated evaluation in humans. Pharm Res. 2000;17:1335–1344. doi: 10.1023/A:1007574217260. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources