Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;10(1):R6.
doi: 10.1186/cc3924.

Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review

Affiliations

Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review

Eddy Fan et al. Crit Care. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from inception until 10 January 2005) for all clinical studies describing the incidence and predictors of adverse events in intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients undergoing interfacility transport. The bibliographies of selected articles were also examined.

Results: Five studies (245 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All were case-series and two were prospective in design. Due to the paucity of studies and significant heterogeneity in study population, outcome events, and results, we synthesized data in a qualitative manner. Pre-transport severity of illness was reported in only one study. The most common indication for transport was a need for investigations and/or specialist care (three studies, 220 patients). Transport modalities included air (fixed or rotor wing; 66% of patients) and ground (31%) ambulance, and commercial aircraft (3%). Transport teams included a physician in three studies (220 patients). Death during transfer was rare (n = 1). No other adverse events or significant therapeutic interventions during transport were reported. One study reported a 19% (28/145) incidence of respiratory alkalosis on arrival and another study documented a 30% overall intensive care unit mortality, while no adverse events or outcomes were reported after arrival in the three other studies.

Conclusion: Insufficient data exist to draw firm conclusions regarding the mortality, morbidity, or risk factors associated with the interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. Further study is required to define the risks and benefits of interfacility transfer in this patient population. Such information is important for the planning and allocation of resources related to transporting critically ill adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mackenzie PA, Smith EA, Wallace PGM. Transfer of adults between intensive care units in the UK. Br Med J. 1997;314:1455–1456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flabouris A. Patient referral and transportation to a regional tertiary ICU: patient demographics, severity of illness and outcome comparison with non-transported patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999;27:385–390. - PubMed
    1. Grieve CF, Ferguson ND, Adhikari N, Singh JM, Moneta SL, DeMajo W, Stewart TE, Scales DC. Utilization pattern of Ontario's critical care referral and transfer facilitation program [abstract] Proc Am Thoracic Soc. 2005;2:A597.
    1. Olson CM, Jastremski MS, Vilogi JP, Madden CM, Beney KM. Stabilization of patients prior to interhospital transport. Am J Emerg Med. 1987;5:33–39. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(87)90285-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ehrenworth J, Sorbo S, Hackel A. Transport of critically ill adults. Crit Care Med. 1986;14:543–547. - PubMed

Publication types