The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study
- PMID: 16356225
- PMCID: PMC1414020
- DOI: 10.1186/cc3909
The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study
Abstract
Introduction: Compliance with the ventilator care bundle affects the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. It was not known, however, whether compliance with sepsis care bundles has an impact on outcome. The aims of the present study were to determine the rate of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles and to determine the impact of the compliance on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study on 101 consecutive adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock on medical or surgical wards, or in accident and emergency areas at two acute National Health Service Trust Teaching hospitals in England. The main outcome measures were: the rate of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis care bundles adapted from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines on patients' clinical care; and the difference in hospital mortality between the compliant and the non-compliant groups.
Results: The median age of the patients was 69 years (interquartile range 51 to 78), and 53% were male. The sources of infection were sought and confirmed in 87 of 101 patients. The chest was the most common source (50%), followed by the abdomen (22%). The rate of compliance with the 6-hour sepsis bundle was 52%. Compared with the compliant group, the non-compliant group had a more than twofold increase in hospital mortality (49% versus 23%, relative risk (RR) 2.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 3.76), P = 0.01) despite similar age and severity of sepsis. Compliance with the 24-hour sepsis bundle was achieved in only 30% of eligible candidates (21/69). Hospital mortality was increased in the non-compliant group from 29% to 50%, with a 76% increase in risk for death, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.76 (95% CI 0.84 to 3.64), P = 0.16).
Conclusion: Non-compliance with the 6-hour sepsis bundle was associated with a more than twofold increase in hospital mortality. Non-compliance with the 24-hour sepsis bundle resulted in a 76% increase in risk for hospital death. All medical staff should practise these relatively simple, easy and cheap bundles within a strict timeframe to improve survival rates in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Figures
Comment in
-
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign sepsis change bundles and clinical practice.Crit Care. 2005;9(6):653-4. doi: 10.1186/cc3952. Epub 2005 Nov 25. Crit Care. 2005. PMID: 16356261 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
[The impact of sepsis bundles on mortality in patients with sepsis shock: a prospective clinical study].Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Sep;20(9):534-7. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008. PMID: 18786312 Chinese.
-
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17334251
-
Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster.J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):455-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Dec 11. J Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 19056006
-
Surviving sepsis campaign in Brazil.Shock. 2008 Oct;30 Suppl 1:47-52. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318181a128. Shock. 2008. PMID: 18704009 Review.
-
Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2686-92. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 18074465 Review.
Cited by
-
Knowledge about systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a survey among Dutch emergency department nurses.Int J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;9(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12245-016-0119-2. Epub 2016 Jul 15. Int J Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27416936 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of modernisation of adult critical care services in England: time series and cost effectiveness analysis.BMJ. 2009 Nov 11;339:b4353. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4353. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19906740 Free PMC article.
-
Late recognition and illness severity are determinants of early death in severe septic patients.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 May;68(5):586-91. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(05)02. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013. PMID: 23778420 Free PMC article.
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23361625 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Compliance with a Care Bundle on Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0132279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132279. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26161979 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) Prevalence of Severe Sepsis Between 1995 and 2000 from 91 Adult ICUs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 2003.
-
- NICE An Appraisal of Drotrecogin Alpha (activated) and Sepsis. 2004.
-
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Bundle Up For Safety http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/CriticalCare/IntensiveCare/ImprovementStor...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical