Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2005;9(6):626-8.
doi: 10.1186/cc3907. Epub 2005 Nov 22.

The staging of sepsis: understanding heterogeneity in treatment efficacy

Affiliations
Comment

The staging of sepsis: understanding heterogeneity in treatment efficacy

John C Marshall. Crit Care. 2005.

Abstract

Human sepsis is an intrinsically complex disease. Populations of patients enrolled into clinical trials of novel sepsis therapies are notoriously heterogeneous with respect to the inciting cause of their disease, the co-morbid conditions that define its course, and the acute severity of their initial presentation. This heterogeneity is reflected in strikingly variable mortality risks across studies, and probably, though less clearly-established, in variable response rates to a given intervention. In an accompanying article in this issue of Critical Care, Macias and colleagues argue that the effectiveness of adjuvant sepsis therapies is not dependent on the baseline mortality risk, since the few "positive" trials that have been published show widely divergent placebo mortality rates. But this analysis assumes that biologically distinct interventions will be equally efficacious in clinically diverse populations, and confuses severity as a population descriptor with severity as a surrogate measure of a biologic state in an individual patient. In a pivotal trial of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) in patients with severe sepsis, an aggregate 6% mortality decrement appeared to be the result of negligible efficacy in the least severely ill patients, and considerably greater efficacy in those who were at greatest risk of dying. A larger follow-up study recruiting low risk patients confirmed this impression, showing a convincing absence of benefit in patients who clinicians judged to be less severely ill. If we accept Macias' argument, we are led to the conclusion that rhAPC is of limited use in the management of severe sepsis. On the other hand, if we view severity as a crude surrogate for a particular pathologic state, we would shift our focus to better defining those populations most likely to benefit from intervention, including patients who may not have met criteria for entry in the original PROWESS trial--those with disseminated intravascular coagulation or acute organ dysfunction from causes other than sepsis. Staging systems that stratify heterogeneous patient populations by risk and by potential to benefit from intervention have proven to be essential to the development of multimodal adjuvant treatment for cancer. They will be no less important in the optimal management of sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Bone R, Balk R, Cerra F, Dellinger RP, Fein A, Knaus W, Sibbald W. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest. 1992;101:1644–1655. - PubMed
    1. Marshall JC, Vincent J-L, Fink MP, Cook DJ, Rubenfeld G, Foster D, Faist E, Reinhart K. Measures, markers, and mediators: Towards a staging system for clinical sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1560–1567. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065186.67848.3A. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy MM, Fink M, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent J-L, Ramsay G. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;34:1250–1256. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macias WL, Nelson DR, Williams M, Garg R, Janes J, Sashegyi A. Lack of evidence for qualitative treatment by disease severity interactions in clinical studies of severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2005;9:R607–R622. doi: 10.1186/cc3795. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eichacker PQ, Oarent C, Kalil A, Esposito C, Cui X, Banks SM, Gerstenberger EP, Fitz Y, Danner RL, Natanson C. Risk and the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents: Retrospective and confirmatory studies of sepsis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1197–1205. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200204-302OC. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms