Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jan 7;332(7532):14-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38678.405370.7C. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use

Nicola Low et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a practice nurse led strategy to improve the notification and treatment of partners of people with chlamydia infection.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 27 general practices in the Bristol and Birmingham areas.

Participants: 140 men and women with chlamydia (index cases) diagnosed by screening of a home collected urine sample or vulval swab specimen.

Interventions: Partner notification at the general practice immediately after diagnosis by trained practice nurses, with telephone follow up by a health adviser; or referral to a specialist health adviser at a genitourinary medicine clinic.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was the proportion of index cases with at least one treated sexual partner. Specified secondary outcomes included the number of sexual contacts elicited during a sexual history, positive test result for chlamydia six weeks after treatment, and the cost of each strategy in 2003 sterling prices.

Results: 65.3% (47/72) of participants receiving practice nurse led partner notification had at least one partner treated compared with 52.9% (39/68) of those referred to a genitourinary medicine clinic (risk difference 12.4%, 95% confidence interval -1.8% to 26.5%). Of 68 participants referred to the clinic, 21 (31%) did not attend. The costs per index case were 32.55 pounds sterling for the practice nurse led strategy and 32.62 pounds sterling for the specialist referral strategy.

Conclusion: Practice based partner notification by trained nurses with telephone follow up by health advisers is at least as effective as referral to a specialist health adviser at a genitourinary medicine clinic, and costs the same. Trial registration Clinical trials: NCT00112255.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through trial

References

    1. Department of Health. Choosing health: making healthier choices easier. CM 6374. London: Stationery Office, 2004.
    1. WHO/joint United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS. Sexually transmitted diseases: policies and principles for prevention and care. Geneva: UNAIDS, 1999. [UNAIDS best practice collection.]
    1. Health Protection Agency. All new episodes seen at GUM clinics: 1999-2003. Country specific tables. London: HPA, 2004.
    1. Pimenta JM, Catchpole M, Rogers PA, Hopwood J, Randall S, Mallinson H, et al. Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. II: prevalence among healthcare attenders, outcome, and evaluation of positive cases. Sex Transm Infect 2003;79: 22-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler M. Sexual health. BMJ 2003;327: 62. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data