Is non-insulin dependent glucose uptake a therapeutic alternative? Part 2: Do such mechanisms fulfil the required combination of power and tolerability?

Abstract

The worldwide burden of diabetes, the unavoidable worsening which is observed in long-term clinical trials despite treatment and the close link between glycaemia and microangiopathy appeal for much stronger treatment strategies. This, in turn, either requires polypharmacy (with new risks) or new, more powerful drugs to be invented. The first part of this review dealt with a thorough analysis of pros and cons for some selected pathways which could potentially increase glucose uptake without necessitating insulin. The choice of such targets for developing completely new drugs, however, requires a favourable background from existing tentatives with either drugs or cell biology approaches. Moreover, because vascular complications are what must ultimately be avoided when treating diabetic patients, we must be sure that increasing glucose uptake in a fashion which is no more controlled by normal physiology is compatible with the physiology of vascular cells (long-term tolerance). The aspect of drug side-effects must therefore be considered systematically. For reasons which are individually developed, it appears that each of the potential pathways analyzed either lacks sufficient power and/or is likely to induce side effects which are not acceptable for long-term application. The fact that GLUT-1 transporters are ubiquitously distributed even extends this cardinal question to the general principle of increasing glucose uptake. In conclusion a precise evaluation suggests that, although non-insulin dependent glucose uptake represents (3/4) of whole body glucose transport, it is difficult to consider such mechanisms able to generate a new treatment fulfilling the unavoidable request of combined efficacy and tolerability.