Cost effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial
- PMID: 16360064
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.033
Cost effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial
Abstract
Objectives: The analysis goal was to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via pacemaker (CRT-P) or pacemaker-defibrillator (CRT-D) in combination with optimal pharmacological therapy (OPT) relative to patients with OPT alone.
Background: In the COMPANION trial, CRT-P and CRT-D reduced the combined risk of all-cause mortality or first hospitalization among patients with advanced heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays, but the cost effectiveness of the therapy remains unknown.
Methods: In this analysis, intent-to-treat trial data were modeled to estimate the cost effectiveness of CRT-D and CRT-P relative to OPT over a base-case seven-year treatment episode. Exponential survival curves were derived from trial data and adjusted by quality-of-life trial results to yield quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). For the first two years, follow-up hospitalizations were based on trial data. The model assumed equalized hospitalization rates beyond two years. Initial implantation and follow-up hospitalization costs were estimated using Medicare data.
Results: Over two years, follow-up hospitalization costs were reduced by 29% for CRT-D and 37% for CRT-P. Extending the cost-effectiveness analysis to a seven-year base-case time period, the ICER for CRT-P was 19,600 dollars per QALY and the ICER for CRT-D was 43,000 dollars per QALY relative to OPT.
Conclusions: For the COMPANION trial patients, the use of CRT-P and CRT-D was associated with a cost-effectiveness ratio below generally accepted benchmarks for therapeutic interventions of 50,000 dollars per QALY to 100,000 dollars per QALY. This suggests that the clinical benefits of CRT-P and CRT-D can be achieved at a reasonable cost.
Comment in
-
Cost effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2322-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16360065 No abstract available.
-
Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 19;48(6):1283. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.032. Epub 2006 Aug 28. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16979020 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The long-term cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(1):42-51. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl382. Epub 2006 Nov 16. Eur Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17110403
-
Mode of death in advanced heart failure: the Comparison of Medical, Pacing, and Defibrillation Therapies in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.016. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16360067
-
Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the CARE-HF trial.Eur Heart J. 2005 Dec;26(24):2681-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi662. Epub 2005 Nov 11. Eur Heart J. 2005. PMID: 16284203 Clinical Trial.
-
[Economic impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure. Available evidence and evaluation of the CRT-Eucomed model for analysis of cost-effectiveness].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2005 Dec;6(12):796-803. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16444923 Review. Italian.
-
Why should we care about CARE-HF?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.057. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16360046 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient reported outcomes measures are infrequently used in clinical studies of heart transplant recipients.JHLT Open. 2023 Dec;2:100019. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2023.100019. Epub 2023 Nov 14. JHLT Open. 2023. PMID: 39193271 Free PMC article.
-
European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey: rationale and design.Eur J Heart Fail. 2009 Mar;11(3):326-30. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp030. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009. PMID: 19228801 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CRT or CRT-D devices? The case for 'high energy' devices.Heart Fail Rev. 2012 Nov;17(6):777-9. doi: 10.1007/s10741-011-9276-9. Heart Fail Rev. 2012. PMID: 21814858 Review.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Among Patients With Mild Heart Failure.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):417-26. doi: 10.7326/M14-1804. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26301323 Free PMC article.
-
Priorities for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Centers for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Working Group.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jul;10(7):e001967. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001967. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28710296 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials