An objective technique to measure the depth-of-focus in free space
- PMID: 16362316
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-0174-5
An objective technique to measure the depth-of-focus in free space
Abstract
Background: Determining the depth-of-focus (DOF) objectively in free space is important, as this provides information regarding the range of clear vision under more natural viewing conditions in which target blur, size, and proximal information, as well as other monocular depth cues, are present.
Methods: The DOF was assessed objectively in free space in young adults [n=20, ages 24.9+/-3.1years: myopes (n=14), emmetropes (n=5), hyperope (n=1)] by monitoring accommodation continuously using the commercially available Power Refractor II (PR II) under monocular viewing conditions. A high-contrast target ( approximately 83%) subtending a mean visual angle of 2.3 deg was placed on an optical bench at 25 cm (4 D) along the line-of-sight of the viewing right eye and was displaced slowly ( approximately 0.1-0.15 D/s) proximally and distally. This target provided blur, size, and proximal information, and other depth cues, as normally found in free space. The first consistent change in steady-state accommodative baseline level reflected one edge of the DOF. The mean dioptric difference between these distal and proximal endpoints was averaged, and this represented the total objective DOF.
Results: The group mean total objective DOF (n=20) was +/-0.61+/-0.09 D, with a range from +/-0.46 D to +/-0.81 D. Repeatability was excellent.
Conclusion: A technique was developed and tested to measure the DOF in free space objectively. Further development of this technique will allow the assessment of blur perception under more complex natural viewing conditions simulating the everyday environment.
Similar articles
-
Objective blur thresholds in free space for different refractive groups.Curr Eye Res. 2006 Feb;31(2):111-8. doi: 10.1080/02713680500514669. Curr Eye Res. 2006. PMID: 16500761
-
Objective depth-of-focus is different from subjective depth-of-focus and correlated with accommodative microfluctuations.Vision Res. 2010 Jun 18;50(13):1266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Apr 22. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20399223
-
The effect of modulating ocular depth of focus upon accommodation microfluctuations in myopic and emmetropic subjects.Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(2):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Nov 22. Vision Res. 2009. PMID: 18992269
-
Aberrations and myopia.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Jul;25(4):285-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00297.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005. PMID: 15953113 Review.
-
A Review of Depth of Focus in Measurement of the Amplitude of Accommodation.Vision (Basel). 2018 Sep 6;2(3):37. doi: 10.3390/vision2030037. Vision (Basel). 2018. PMID: 31735900 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Accommodation and pupil responses to random-dot stereograms.J Optom. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 16. J Optom. 2016. PMID: 25891121 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada.Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 4;15:4015-4027. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S294428. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 34675470 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of Lens-Induced Astigmatism at Near and Far Distances.Clin Optom (Auckl). 2023 May 6;15:105-117. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S405472. eCollection 2023. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2023. PMID: 37181864 Free PMC article.
-
Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review.Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 22;10:1365-73. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S93714. eCollection 2016. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27555744 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials