A novel method distinguishes between mutation rates and fixation biases in patterns of single-nucleotide substitution
- PMID: 16362483
- DOI: 10.1007/s00239-005-0207-z
A novel method distinguishes between mutation rates and fixation biases in patterns of single-nucleotide substitution
Erratum in
- J Mol Evol. 2006 Feb;62(2):245
Abstract
Analysis of the genome-wide patterns of single-nucleotide substitution reveals that the human GC content structure is out of equilibrium. The substitutions are decreasing the overall GC content (GC), at the same time making its range narrower. Investigation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) revealed that presently the decrease in GC content is due to a uniform mutational preference for A:T pairs, while its projected range is due to a variability in the fixation preference for G:C pairs. However, it is important to determine whether lessons learned about evolutionary processes operating at the present time (that is reflected in the SNP data) can be extended back into the evolutionary past. We describe here a new approach to this problem that utilizes the juxtaposition of forward and reverse substitution rates to determine the relative importance of variability in mutation rates and fixation probabilities in shaping long-term substitutional patterns. We use this approach to demonstrate that the forces shaping GC content structure over the recent past (since the appearance of the SNPs) extend all the way back to the mammalian radiation approximately 90 million years ago. In addition, we find a small but significant effect that has not been detected in the SNP data-relatively high rates of C:G-->A:T germline mutation in low-GC regions of the genome.
Similar articles
-
Distinct changes of genomic biases in nucleotide substitution at the time of Mammalian radiation.Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Nov;20(11):1887-96. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg204. Epub 2003 Jul 28. Mol Biol Evol. 2003. PMID: 12885958
-
Substantial regional variation in substitution rates in the human genome: importance of GC content, gene density, and telomere-specific effects.J Mol Evol. 2005 Jun;60(6):748-63. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0222-5. Epub 2005 May 31. J Mol Evol. 2005. PMID: 15959677
-
Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 2005 Feb;169(2):709-22. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.032250. Epub 2004 Nov 1. Genetics. 2005. PMID: 15520267 Free PMC article.
-
Fixation biases affecting human SNPs.Trends Genet. 2004 Mar;20(3):122-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.01.005. Trends Genet. 2004. PMID: 15049304 Review.
-
On parameters of the human genome.J Theor Biol. 2011 Nov 7;288:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.021. Epub 2011 Aug 3. J Theor Biol. 2011. PMID: 21821053 Review.
Cited by
-
Evolutionary patterns of DNA base composition and correlation to polymorphisms in DNA repair systems.Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):3614-25. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv197. Epub 2015 Mar 12. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015. PMID: 25765652 Free PMC article.
-
Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: the footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion.Genome Res. 2007 Oct;17(10):1420-30. doi: 10.1101/gr.6395807. Epub 2007 Sep 4. Genome Res. 2007. PMID: 17785536 Free PMC article.
-
Directionality of point mutation and 5-methylcytosine deamination rates in the chimpanzee genome.BMC Genomics. 2006 Dec 13;7:316. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-316. BMC Genomics. 2006. PMID: 17166280 Free PMC article.
-
Faster than neutral evolution of constrained sequences: the complex interplay of mutational biases and weak selection.Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:383-95. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr032. Epub 2011 Apr 17. Genome Biol Evol. 2011. PMID: 21498884 Free PMC article.
-
Uncertainty in homology inferences: assessing and improving genomic sequence alignment.Genome Res. 2008 Feb;18(2):298-309. doi: 10.1101/gr.6725608. Epub 2007 Dec 11. Genome Res. 2008. PMID: 18073381 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous