Bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumors in patients with acquired cystic kidney disease
- PMID: 16366867
- DOI: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.606
Bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumors in patients with acquired cystic kidney disease
Abstract
Purpose: We describe our experience with simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy performed in patients with acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) and renal tumors.
Materials and methods: Between June 2000 and September 2002, 10 patients with ACKD underwent simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal lesions suspicious for carcinoma. The lesions were discovered during pretransplant evaluation in 9 patients and incidentally in 1 renal transplant recipient. A 3- or 4-port transperitoneal approach was used for each side to mobilize the kidney and secure the renal hilum. Both specimens were extracted through a midline supraumbilical incision. Operative time, blood loss, analgesic requirements, hospital stay, and convalescence and recurrence rates were determined.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 41.6 years (range, 29-47 years). Mean operative time was 6.5 hours (range, 4.5-9.7 hours) and mean estimated blood loss was 164 cc (range, 50-300 cc). There was one intraoperative complication-a clotted arteriovenous (AV) graft; and 2 postoperative complications-1 fluid overload and 1 adrenal insufficiency. The average length of hospital stay was 3.1 days (range, 2-4 days) and mean convalescence was 2.8 weeks (range, 1-6 weeks). All cancers were confined to the kidneys and there has been no recurrence during follow-up ranging from 6 to 26 months.
Conclusion: Bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in end-stage renal disease patients is safe and feasible. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach include minimal intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, minimal postoperative pain, and a rapid return to normal activity. The laparoscopic technique offers an effective, minimally invasive therapeutic alternative to open surgery in high-risk end-stage renal disease patients.
Similar articles
-
Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease.Ther Apher Dial. 2012 Jun;16(3):254-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2012.01060.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Ther Apher Dial. 2012. PMID: 22607569
-
Laparoscopic bilateral hand assisted nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: initial experience.J Urol. 2001 Jul;166(1):42-7. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11435819
-
Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1153-9. J Urol. 2000. PMID: 10992356
-
[Robotic partial nephrectomy: an initial experience in 25 consecutive cases].Actas Urol Esp. 2012 Jan;36(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 9. Actas Urol Esp. 2012. PMID: 21831484 Review. Spanish.
-
Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach.Urol Oncol. 2004 Mar-Apr;22(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00137-6. Urol Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15082009 Review.
Cited by
-
Wide range and variation in minimally invasive surgery for renal malignancy in Japan: a population-based analysis.Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec;18(6):1070-7. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0500-y. Epub 2012 Nov 23. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23179640
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical