Biofilm diatom community structure: influence of temporal and substratum variability
- PMID: 16371339
- DOI: 10.1080/08927010500256757
Biofilm diatom community structure: influence of temporal and substratum variability
Abstract
Diatoms, which are early autotrophic colonisers, are an important constituent of the biofouling community in the marine environment. The effects of substratum and temporal variations on the fouling diatom community structure in a monsoon-influenced tropical estuary were studied. Fibreglass and glass coupons were exposed every month for a period of 4 days and the diatom population sampled at 24 h intervals, over a period of 14 months. The planktonic diatom community structure differed from the biofilm community. Pennate diatoms dominated the biofilms whilst centric diatoms were dominant in the water column. Among the biofilm diatoms, species belonging to the genera Navicula, Amphora, Nitzschia, Pleurosigma and Thalassionema were dominant. On certain occasions, the influence of planktonic blooms was also seen on the biofilm community. A comparative study of biofilms formed on the two substrata revealed significant differences in density and diversity. However species composition was almost constant. In addition to substratum variations, the biofilm diatom community structure also showed significant seasonal variations, which were attributed to physico-chemical and biological changes in both the water and substratum. Temporal variations in the tychopelagic diatoms of the water were also observed to exert an influence on the biofilm diatom community. Variations in diatom communities may determine the functional ecosystem of the benthic environment.
Similar articles
-
Seasonal variations in the fouling diatom community structure from a monsoon influenced tropical estuary.Biofouling. 2008;24(6):415-26. doi: 10.1080/08927010802340317. Biofouling. 2008. PMID: 18668383
-
Species interactions within a fouling diatom community: roles of nutrients, initial inoculum and competitive strategies.Biofouling. 2007;23(1-2):99-112. doi: 10.1080/08927010701191753. Biofouling. 2007. PMID: 17453734
-
Development of the initial diatom microfouling layer on antifouling and fouling-release surfaces in temperate and tropical Australia.Biofouling. 2009 Nov;25(8):685-94. doi: 10.1080/08927010903089912. Biofouling. 2009. PMID: 20183127
-
Effects of pesticides on freshwater diatoms.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010;203:87-103. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1352-4_2. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010. PMID: 19957117 Review.
-
The biology of biofouling diatoms and their role in the development of microbial slimes.Biofouling. 2008;24(5):365-79. doi: 10.1080/08927010802254583. Biofouling. 2008. PMID: 18604655 Review.
Cited by
-
Spatio-Temporal Variations of Marine Biofilm Communities Colonizing Artificial Substrata Including Antifouling Coatings in Contrasted French Coastal Environments.Microb Ecol. 2017 Oct;74(3):585-598. doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-0966-2. Epub 2017 Apr 3. Microb Ecol. 2017. PMID: 28374061
-
Marine biofilms: diversity, interactions and biofouling.Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Nov;20(11):671-684. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00744-7. Epub 2022 May 25. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35614346 Review.
-
Sources and resources: importance of nutrients, resource allocation, and ecology in microalgal cultivation for lipid accumulation.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Jun;98(11):4805-16. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5694-7. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014. PMID: 24695829 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Phytoplankton community structure in relation to environmental factors from the New Mangalore Port waters along the southwest coast of India.Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 23;190(8):481. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6840-y. Environ Monit Assess. 2018. PMID: 30039305
-
Microbial carrying capacity and carbon biomass of plastic marine debris.ISME J. 2021 Jan;15(1):67-77. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00756-2. Epub 2020 Sep 2. ISME J. 2021. PMID: 32879460 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources