Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jan;91(1):F67-71.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.068569.

Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn

Affiliations
Review

Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn

J Tripp et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

The rapid progress of medical technology has resulted in more opportunities to maintain the life of infants in serious and potentially life threatening situations. Whether to treat such infants is a common dilemma. The burden of these difficult decisions rests almost equally on distraught parents and relatives and on the professional staff of neonatal units. Sometimes, either parents or care teams choose to seek a decision from the courts. Ways of reaching the best possible and most inclusive consensus decisions are examined in this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none declared

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Campbell A G M. Ethical problems in neonatal care. In: Rennie JM, Robertson NRC, eds. Textbook of neonatology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 19991345–1350.
    1. Hope T, Savulescu J, Hendrick J.Medical ethics and law: the core curriculum. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2003157–175.
    1. McHaffie H E.Crucial decisions at the beginning of life. Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd, 20011–4.
    1. Shooter M, Watson A. The ethics of withholding and withdrawing dialysis therapy in infants. Pediatr Nephrol 200014347–351. - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Physicians Ethics in practice: background and recommendations for enhanced support. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2005