Conformation analysis of aspartame-based sweeteners by NMR spectroscopy, molecular dynamics simulations, and X-ray diffraction studies
- PMID: 16372303
- DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200500332
Conformation analysis of aspartame-based sweeteners by NMR spectroscopy, molecular dynamics simulations, and X-ray diffraction studies
Abstract
We report here the synthesis and the conformation analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy and computer simulations of six potent sweet molecules, N-[3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylbutyl]-alpha-L-aspartyl-S-tert-butyl-L-cysteine 1-methylester (1; 70 000 times more potent than sucrose), N-[3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylbutyl]-alpha-L-aspartyl-beta-cyclohexyl-L-alanine 1-methylester (2; 50 000 times more potent than sucrose), N-[3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylbutyl]-alpha-L-aspartyl-4-cyan-L-phenylalanine 1-methylester (3; 2 000 times more potent than sucrose), N-[3,3-dimethylbutyl]-alpha-L-aspartyl-(1R,2S,4S)-1-methyl-2-hydroxy-4-phenylhexylamide (4; 5500 times more potent than sucrose), N-[3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propyl]-alpha-L-aspartyl-(1R,2S,4S)-1-methyl-2-hydroxy-4-phenylhexylamide (5; 15 000 times more potent than sucrose), and N-[3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylbutyl]-alpha-L-aspartyl-(1R,2S,4S)-1-methyl-2-hydroxy-4-phenylhexylamide (6; 15 000 times more potent than sucrose). The "L-shaped" structure, which we believe to be responsible for sweet taste, is accessible to all six molecules in solution. This structure is characterized by a zwitterionic ring formed by the AH- and B-containing moieties located along the +y axis and by the hydrophobic group X pointing into the +x axis. Extended conformations with the AH- and B-containing moieties along the +y axis and the hydrophobic group X pointing into the -y axis were observed for all six sweeteners. For compound 5, the crystal-state conformation was also determined by an X-ray diffraction study. The result indicates that compound 5 adopts an L-shaped structure even in the crystalline state. The extraordinary potency of the N-arylalkylated or N-alkylated compounds 1-6, as compared with that of the unsubstituted aspartame-based sweet taste ligands, can be explained by the effect of a second hydrophobic binding domain in addition to interactions arising from the L-shaped structure. In our examination of the unexplored D zone of the Tinti-Nofre model, we discovered a sweet-potency-enhancing effect of arylalkyl substitution on dipeptide ligands, which reveals the importance of hydrophobic (aromatic)-hydrophobic (aromatic) interactions in maintaining high potency.
Similar articles
-
Conformational analysis of potent sweet taste ligands by nuclear magnetic resonance, computer simulations and X-ray diffraction studies.J Pept Res. 1997 Oct;50(4):286-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1997.tb01470.x. J Pept Res. 1997. PMID: 9352467
-
Sweet and bitter taste: structure and conformations of two aspartame dipeptide analogues.J Pept Sci. 1995 Nov-Dec;1(6):349-59. doi: 10.1002/psc.310010602. J Pept Sci. 1995. PMID: 9223014
-
X-ray structures of new dipeptide taste ligands.J Pept Sci. 1998 Jun;4(4):229-38. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1387(199806)4:4%3C229::AID-PSC139%3E3.0.CO;2-R. J Pept Sci. 1998. PMID: 9680057
-
Conformational flexibility of aspartame.Biopolymers. 2016 May;106(3):376-84. doi: 10.1002/bip.22847. Biopolymers. 2016. PMID: 27038223 Review.
-
Treatment of osteoarthritis with aspartame.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998 May;63(5):580-93. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90109-6. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998. PMID: 9630831 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources