Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jan;32(1):61-2.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012302.

Brief report on the experience of using proxy consent for incapacitated adults

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief report on the experience of using proxy consent for incapacitated adults

S Mason et al. J Med Ethics. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, which came into force in the UK in May 2004, cover the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products. They allow a legal representative (a person not connected with the conduct of the trial) to consent to the participation of incompetent adults in medical research. Currently, very little is known about how such representatives will make their decisions. We have experience with proxy consent for older adults in a large, national trial. From 2445 potentially eligible but incapacitated patients, proxy, relative assent resulted in trial participation of only 87 (3.6%) patients. The reasons for this were that a large number of incapacitated patients had no relative available for assent (2286), but also a high proportion of relatives approached refused to provide assent (72/159, 45.3%). In comparison, 17.7% of patients declined participation in the trial.Proxy consent allowed only a small increase in trial recruitment of incapacitated patients. The fact that a greater proportion of relatives than patients refused to provide assent implies that they were more cautious than the patients themselves, or perhaps used different criteria, when making their decision. In future research involving incapacitated older patients there is likely to be heavy reliance on proxy consent provision by legal representatives. Our findings imply that consent decisions of legal representatives will not necessarily reflect those of patients themselves.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beauchamp T, Childress J.Principles of biomedical ethics [5th ed]. Oxford: OUP, 2001
    1. Neuberger J.Ethics and health care. The role of research ethics committees in the United Kingdom. London: King's Fund Institute, 1992
    1. Sugarman J, McCory D, Hubal R. Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research. J Am Geriatrics Society 199846517–524. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health National service framework for older people. London: Department of Health, 2001
    1. Turner N J, Haward R A, Mulley G P.et al Cancer in old age—is it adequately investigated and treated? BMJ 1999319309–312. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types