Does the type of promotional material influence men's attendance at skin screening clinics?
- PMID: 16375040
- DOI: 10.1071/he05229
Does the type of promotional material influence men's attendance at skin screening clinics?
Abstract
Issue addressed: The incidence of skin cancer is rising in many populations around the world. In Australia, men have both the highest incidence of thick melanoma and an increased risk of dying from this disease. Skin screening may provide a method for detecting lesions at an earlier stage. This study sought to assess the impact of two methods of encouraging men to attend free open-access skin screening clinics.
Methods: A randomised controlled trial of two recruitment methods. Subjects comprised all men aged 30 to 79 years (n=1,322) from a rural community. We randomly allocated 50% (661) to receive a personalised letter with the remaining 50% receiving the letter plus an additional brochure.
Results: Both groups were similar in age distribution. A total of 250 men (18.9%) attended the skin screening clinic. Overall, there was no difference in rates of attendance between the two groups. Younger men (30 to 49 years) in the letter and brochure group were more likely to attend a clinic, while men > or =50 years in the letter only group were more likely to attend (p=0.01)
Conclusions: These results indicate that a personalised letter or targeted approach of invitation is effective in encouraging men to attend a skin screening clinic. The addition of health information through the use of a glossy brochure did not increase screening participation among men over 50.
Similar articles
-
Who attends skin cancer clinics within a randomized melanoma screening program?Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.10.003. Epub 2006 Feb 2. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006. PMID: 16457967 Clinical Trial.
-
Do centralised skin screening clinics increase participation in melanoma screening (Australia)?Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Mar;17(2):161-8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0419-y. Cancer Causes Control. 2006. PMID: 16425094 Clinical Trial.
-
What motivates men age > or =50 years to participate in a screening program for melanoma?Cancer. 2006 Aug 15;107(4):815-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22051. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16832794
-
Crafting a melanoma educational campaign to reach middle-aged and older men.J Cutan Med Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;10(6):259-68. doi: 10.2310/7750.2006.00066. J Cutan Med Surg. 2006. PMID: 17241595 Review.
-
Screening for skin cancer.Am J Prev Med. 2001 Apr;20(3 Suppl):47-58. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00258-6. Am J Prev Med. 2001. PMID: 11306232 Review.
Cited by
-
Screening for reducing morbidity and mortality in malignant melanoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 3;6(6):CD012352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012352.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31157404 Free PMC article.
-
What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jul 3;8:141. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-141. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 18598339 Free PMC article.
-
The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0859-9. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 31730474 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of a Skin Self-Examination Programme: a Four-Stage Recursive Model.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):1063-1067. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.4.1063. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017. PMID: 28547942 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services.J Med Screen. 2017 Sep;24(3):127-145. doi: 10.1177/0969141316664757. Epub 2016 Oct 17. J Med Screen. 2017. PMID: 27754937 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical