Electronic patient record systems and the general practitioner: an evaluation study
- PMID: 16375802
- DOI: 10.1258/135763305775124641
Electronic patient record systems and the general practitioner: an evaluation study
Abstract
We studied how well electronic patient record (EPR) systems meet the needs of general practitioners (GPs) and other health-care professionals for specific information. GPs in eight health centres in the South-Ostrobothnia region of Finland were invited to participate. They used three types of EPR system. They were asked to access EPRs to obtain 20 types of information for patients receiving anticoagulant treatment. In total 2,389 patient cases were studied. All of the information requested was available for 73% of the cases (range 55-93%). There was a significant difference between the type of EPR system and the percentage of patients for whom information was available through the EPR. However, further analysis showed that differences in performance between EPR systems probably reflected differences in the way EPRs were used by different organizations. Great care should be taken in attempts to rank EPR systems based on their performance.
Similar articles
-
What factors affect the use of electronic patient records by Irish GPs?Int J Med Inform. 2009 Aug;78(8):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Apr 16. Int J Med Inform. 2009. PMID: 19375381
-
Management of electronic patient record systems in primary healthcare in a Finnish county.Telemed J E Health. 2010 Dec;16(10):1017-23. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0031. Epub 2010 Nov 8. Telemed J E Health. 2010. PMID: 21058891
-
The electronic patient record in general practice--a South-African perspective.Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;52 Pt 1:9-13. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998. PMID: 10384409
-
Electronic patient records: moving from islands and bridges towards electronic health records for continuity of care.Yearb Med Inform. 2007:34-46. Yearb Med Inform. 2007. PMID: 17700902 Review.
-
Electronic patient record and archive of records in Cardio.net system for telecardiology.Pol J Pathol. 2003;54(3):223-6. Pol J Pathol. 2003. PMID: 14703293 Review.
Cited by
-
Methods to evaluate health information systems in healthcare settings: a literature review.J Med Syst. 2007 Oct;31(5):397-432. doi: 10.1007/s10916-007-9082-z. J Med Syst. 2007. PMID: 17918694 Review.
-
How to measure the QoS of a web-based EHRs system: development of an instrument.J Med Syst. 2012 Dec;36(6):3725-31. doi: 10.1007/s10916-012-9845-z. Epub 2012 Mar 17. J Med Syst. 2012. PMID: 22427175
-
How does nursing staff perceive the use of electronic handover reports? A questionnaire-based study.Int J Telemed Appl. 2011;2011:505426. doi: 10.1155/2011/505426. Epub 2011 Jun 9. Int J Telemed Appl. 2011. PMID: 21760779 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous