Effects of end-goal on hand shaping
- PMID: 16381806
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.01107.2005
Effects of end-goal on hand shaping
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine whether hand shaping was affected by planning of an action subsequent to object contact. Ten subjects (5 females and 5 males, ages 19-33) were requested to reach toward and grasp a convex object between the thumb and the four fingers of the right hand and to perform one of the following actions: 1) lift up the object; 2) insert the object into a niche of a similar shape and size as the object, or 3) insert the object into a rectangular niche much larger than the object. Flexion/extension at the metacarpal-phalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints of all digits were measured using resistive sensors embedded in a glove. Although all experimental conditions required grasping the same object, we found different covariation patterns among finger joint angles across conditions. Gradual preshaping of the hand occurred only when planning object lift or when the end-goal required object placement into the tight niche. In contrast, for the larger niche, gradual preshaping was not evident for the ring and the little finger. Further, reaching movements were faster for movements ending with the larger niche than for the other movement conditions. The present results suggest that hand shaping takes into account end-goal in addition to object geometry. We discuss these findings in the context of forward internal models that allow the prediction of the sensorimotor consequences of motor commands in advance to their execution.
Similar articles
-
Arches of the hand in reach to grasp.J Biomech. 2008;41(4):829-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Feb 20. J Biomech. 2008. PMID: 18076888
-
Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(2):194-205. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0723-0. Epub 2006 Oct 19. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17051383
-
Control of hand shaping in response to object shape perturbation.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0840-9. Epub 2007 Jan 26. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17256167
-
An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(1):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1136-4. Epub 2007 Oct 2. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 17909766
-
Internal models for bi-manual tasks.Hum Mov Sci. 2004 Nov;23(5):747-70. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.009. Hum Mov Sci. 2004. PMID: 15589630 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of cognitive functions and behavioral context on grasping kinematics.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(3):387-97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3379-y. Epub 2012 Dec 29. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23274646
-
Motor performance in a shape sorter task: A longitudinal study from 14 to 36 months of age in children with an older sibling ASD.PLoS One. 2019 May 28;14(5):e0217416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217416. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31136606 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of social intention on movement kinematics in cooperative actions.Front Neurorobot. 2013 Oct 4;7:14. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00014. eCollection 2013. Front Neurorobot. 2013. PMID: 24109450 Free PMC article.
-
Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2649-4. Epub 2011 Apr 5. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21465414
-
Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 May 5;371(1693):20150375. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0375. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27069052 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources