Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1992 Jul 11;305(6845):82-4.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6845.82.

Recruitment methods for screening programmes: trial of a new method within a regional osteoporosis study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Recruitment methods for screening programmes: trial of a new method within a regional osteoporosis study

M J Garton et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the response rates and operating costs of three recruitment methods within a regional osteoporosis screening programme.

Design: Randomised trial of three types of invitation letter: one offering fixed appointments with option to change time, one offering fixed appointments but requiring telephoned confirmation of intention to attend, and one inviting recipient to telephone to make an appointment.

Setting: Osteoporosis screening unit, Aberdeen.

Subjects: 1200 women aged 45-49 years living within 32 km of Aberdeen and randomly selected from the community health index. 400 women were randomised to each appointment method.

Main outcome measures: Numbers attending for screening; default rate among women who confirmed appointments; social class of attenders; cost per appointment slot and per completed scan.

Results: 299 (75%), 277 (69%), and 217 (54%) women were scanned after fixed, confirmable, and open invitations respectively. Women who attended were given a questionnaire, and 694 (87.5%) returned it. No significant differences were found in the social class of attenders among the three methods. Of the 514 women who made or confirmed appointments, 494 attended for a scan. Total costs per scan were 25.00 pounds, 21.40 pounds, and 21.00 pounds for fixed, confirmable, and open invitations respectively.

Conclusions: The offer of a fixed appointment requiring telephoned confirmation has the potential to reduce the costs of scanning without exaggerating any social bias or significantly reducing response rates provided that empty appointments can be rebooked at short notice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 1989 Jul 15;299(6692):158-9 - PubMed
    1. Community Med. 1988 Nov;10(4):327-30 - PubMed
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Mar;34(1):19-22 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1976 Oct 9;2(6040):858-60 - PubMed
    1. Practitioner. 1967 Feb;198(184):274-80 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources