Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Autumn-Winter;50(3-4):167-87.
doi: 10.1080/19485565.2003.9989070.

How big are educational and racial fertility differentials in the U.S.?

Affiliations

How big are educational and racial fertility differentials in the U.S.?

Yang Yang et al. Soc Biol. 2003 Autumn-Winter.

Abstract

Using pooled data from the 1980, 1985, 1990 and 1995 CPS and 1988 and 1995 NSFG surveys, we show that shifts in fertility timing have occurred disproportionately for the more educated and for whites (compared to the less educated and to African Americans). Such timing shifts imply that the underlying period quantum of fertility is considerably higher for college-educated women and for whites than suggested by the standard total fertility rate. Applying the Bongaarts-Feeney model (1998), we decompose observed racial and educational differences in age-order-specific fertility rates and TFR into tempo and quantum components. We find that a modest part of educational differences and a substantial part of racial difference in period fertility can be attributed to differential changes in tempo. Analysis by race and education shows a clear interaction: higher fertility among African Americans is confined to the less educated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Observed and Predicted TFR by Education and Race: CPS & NSFG
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Observed and Predicted MAC by Education and Race: CPS & NSFG
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
TFR by Parity and Education
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Estimated TFR and Adjusted TFR′: By Education
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Estimated TFR and Adjusted TFR′: By Race
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Percentage Women with Some College Education or More (Educ > =13)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
TFR and TFR′ (Adj. TFR) by Race and Education
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
1990–1993 TFR and TFR′: By Race and Education
Fig. A.1
Fig. A.1
Data Imputed as a Result of Selecting Women Age 22+ at Survey Date

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bean FD, Swicegood G. Mexican American fertility patterns. University of Texas Press; Austin: 1985.
    1. Bean FD, Marcum JP. Differential fertility and the minority group status hypothesis: An assessment and review. In: Bean FD, Parker Frisbie W, editors. The Demography of Racial and Ethnic Groups. Academic Press; New York: 1978. pp. 189–211.
    1. Bean FD, Tienda M. The Hispanic population of the United States. Russell Sage; New York: 1987.
    1. Bean FD, Bell-Rose S. Immigration and opportunity: Race. ethnicity. and employment in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation; New York: 1999.
    1. Belanger A, Ouellet G. A comparative study of recent trends in Canadian and American fertility. 1980-1999. In: Belanger A, editor. Report on the Demographic Situation in Canada. Statistics Canada; Ottawa: 2002. 2001. pp. 107–136.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources