Comparison of effect of treatment with etidronate and alendronate on lumbar bone mineral density in elderly women with osteoporosis
- PMID: 16385649
- PMCID: PMC2810587
- DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.6.750
Comparison of effect of treatment with etidronate and alendronate on lumbar bone mineral density in elderly women with osteoporosis
Retraction in
-
Retraction: Paper "Comparison of Effect of Treatment with Etidronate and Alendronate on Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Women with Osteoporosis" by Iwamoto J, et al. [Yonsei Med J 2005;46(6):750-758].Yonsei Med J. 2019 Jan;60(1):117. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.1.117. Yonsei Med J. 2019. PMID: 30554500 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The purpose of this open-labeled prospective study was to compare the treatment effects of cyclical etidronate and alendronate on the lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone resorption, and back pain in elderly women with osteoporosis. Fifty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, age ranging from 55 to 86 years (mean: 70.7 years), were randomly divided into two groups with 25 patients in each group: the cyclical etidronate group (etidronate 200 mg daily for 2 weeks every 3 months) and the alendronate group (5 mg daily). The BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) measured by DXA, the urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) level measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and back pain evaluated by the face scale score were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, years since menopause, lumbar BMD, urinary NTX level, and face scale score between the two treatment groups. Etidronate treatment sustained the lumbar BMD following a reduction in the urinary NTX level and improved back pain, while alendronate treatment reduced the urinary NTX level more significantly, resulting in an increase in the lumbar BMD, and similarly improved back pain. No serious adverse events were observed in either group. This study confirmed that alendronate treatment had a greater efficacy than etidronate treatment in increasing the lumbar BMD through the reduction of bone resorption in elderly women with osteoporosis.
Conflict of interest statement
We have no funding sources; We have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Shiraki M, Kushida K, Fukunaga M, Kishimoto H, Taga M, Nakamura T, et al. A double-masked multicenter comparative study between alendronate and alfacalcidol in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:183–192. - PubMed
-
- Kushida K, Shiraki M, Nakamura T, Kishimoto H, Morii H, Yamamoto K, et al. The efficacy of alendronate in reducing the risk for vertebral fracture in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy trial. Current Therapeutic Research. 2002;63(9):606–620.
-
- Fujita T, Orimo H, Inoue T, Kaneda K, Sakurai M, Morita R, et al. Double-blind multicenter comparative study with alfacalcidol of etidronate disodium (EHDP) in involutional osteoporosis (in Japanese) Clin Eval. 1993;21:261–302.
-
- Rogers MJ, Frith JC, Luckman SP, Coxon FR, Benford HL, Monkkonen J, et al. Molecular mechanism of action of bisphosphonate. Bone. 1999;24(5 Suppl):73S–79S. - PubMed
-
- Cranny A, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Wells G, Tugwell P, Rosen C. Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2002;23:570–578. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
