Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Nov;37(9):3682-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.100.

Living donor renal transplantation in Catalonia: overall results and comparison of survival with cadaveric donor renal transplantation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Living donor renal transplantation in Catalonia: overall results and comparison of survival with cadaveric donor renal transplantation

R García-Maset et al. Transplant Proc. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the general characteristics of living-donor renal transplantation (LRT) in Catalonia, and to compare results with those of the cadaveric donor renal transplant (CRT).

Results: Four hundred seventy-three LRTs have been performed in Catalonia since 1965. Transplantations carried out between 1980 and 2003, according to the RMRC data, were reviewed. The most frequent degrees of kinship are parents-children (48%), spouses (22%), and siblings (18%). Around 68% of the donors were women. Around 56% of recipients were men. The transplant was advanced in approximately 30% of the cases. The mean cold ischemia was 2 hours. Seven percent showed delayed graft function (DGF). Forty-nine percent of the patients had glomerular filtration >60 mL/min after 1 year. Patient survival at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years were 99%, 97%, 93%, and 82% in LRT; and 96%, 90%, 80%, and 62% in CRT (P < .00001). Graft survivals over the same periods were 91%, 76%, 58%, and 32% in LRT, and 85%, 69%, 49%, and 23% in CRT (P = .00008). The graft mean life was 12 years (LRT) and 10 years (CRT). Graft survivals, censoring deaths over the same periods, were 93%, 79%, 62%, and 39% in LRT, and 89%, 77%, 62%, and 37% in CRT (P = .3). Mean life was 14 years in both cases. The recipients mean age was 31 (LRT), and 44 years (CRT), whereas the donor mean age was 51 (LRT), and 42 years (CRT).

Conclusions: LRT results were excellent both regarding DGF and patient and graft survivals. They were not comparable to CRT due to the different characteristics of the recipients. LRT is a good solution to reduce waiting lists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources