Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2003 Apr-Jun;1(2):85-90.

A comparative study between nifedipine and isoxsuprine in the suppression of preterm labour

Affiliations
  • PMID: 16388203
Randomized Controlled Trial

A comparative study between nifedipine and isoxsuprine in the suppression of preterm labour

R Raymajhi et al. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2003 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Preterm labour and delivery remains a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Numerous drugs and interventions have been used to prevent and inhibit preterm labour but none have been found to be completely effective with the choice being further limited by troublesome side effects. This study compares in a prospective and randomised design the efficacy and safety of the calcium antagonist Nifedipine with the beta mimetic Isoxsuprine. 81.25% of patients receiving Nifedipine and 70% of those receiving Isoxsuprine achieved successful tocolysis. The mean prolongation of pregnancy with Nifedipine was 25+/-19.85 days and with Isoxsuprine it was 19.18+/-17.82 days. Maternal side effects were similar in both groups with hypotension and tachycardia being the commonest. Discontinuation rates were also similar with pulmonary oedema and severe hypotension being the reasons for foregoing tocolysis. It can be concluded that Nifedipine is a safe and effective alternative to Isoxsuprine for suppressing preterm labour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources