Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2005 Dec;29(4):170-80.
doi: 10.1097/01.npt.0000282314.40230.40.

Center of pressure measures during standing tasks in minimally impaired persons with multiple sclerosis

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Center of pressure measures during standing tasks in minimally impaired persons with multiple sclerosis

Gregory M Karst et al. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Balance impairments are common in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), but clinical balance tests may not detect subtle deficits in adults with MS who are not yet experiencing functional limitations or disability. The purpose of this study was to determine if center of pressure (COP) displacement during standing tasks could be a useful performance-based evaluative measure for adults with MS who have minimal or no balance deficits on clinical examination using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS).

Subjects and methods: Twenty-one adults with MS were compared with 21 age- and gendermatched healthy adults. Subjects with MS were tested with the BBS, Mini-mental State Exam, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC). They also performed voluntary leaning and reaching movements while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Control subjects performed the same tasks with the exception of the EDSS and MSFC.

Results: COP displacement during reaching and leaning was less in adults with MS when compared to control subjects. There were no differences in anthropometric, kinematic, or foot position variables that could account for this difference. Furthermore, there was no difference between groups when COP displacement during reaching was expressed as a percentage of the maximum COP displacement during leaning.

Discussion and conclusion: COP measures show clear differences when comparing healthy adults with minimally impaired adults with MS. The lack of between-group differences when COP displacement during reaching was expressed as a percentage of the maximum COP displacement during leaning suggests that the subjects with MS adopt a reaching strategy that allows them to stay within their reduced limits of stability. COP measures during standing tasks appear well-suited to quantifying changes in postural control over time or in response to intervention for minimally impaired persons with MS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources