Different kinetics of immunologic recovery using nelfinavir or lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens in children with perinatal HIV-1 infection
- PMID: 16388722
- DOI: 10.1177/039463200501800416
Different kinetics of immunologic recovery using nelfinavir or lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens in children with perinatal HIV-1 infection
Abstract
The choice to include the optimal protease inhibitor (PI) in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in children with perinatal HIV-1 infection is still under debate. Virologic and immunologic outcomes of three different regimens in an observational paediatric cohort were compared. Data from 12 saquinavir-, 18 nelfinavir-, and 10 lopinavir/ritonavir-treated children were analyzed after 4 and 24 weeks of therapy. Immunologic and virologic outcomes were compared using multivariate analysis adjusting the results for age, baseline CD4+ T-lymphocyte count and baseline viral load. Saquinavir-treated children displayed significant reduction in viral load at week 24 (but not at week 4) and no increase in CD4+ T-lymphocyte count, indicating a poor advantage in using this drug. Lopinavir/ritonavir-treated children presented lower viral loads than nelfinavir-treated children at week 4 (P=0.020) and week 24 (P<0.0001). Virologic failure occurred in 6/18 (33.3%) nelfinavir-treated children but in no child receiving lopinavir/ritonavir (P=0.013). An undetectable viral load was achieved in 9/10 (90.0%) lopinavir/ritonavir- vs. 3/18 (16.6%) nelfinavir-treated children (P<0.0001). No significant difference in CD4+ T-lymphocyte count was observed between lopinavir/ritonavir- and nelfinavir-treated children at weeks 4 and 24. However, a different kinetic of the immunologic recovery was observed. Lopinavir/ritonavir-treated children displayed higher CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts than saquinavir-treated children since the first month of therapy (week 4: P=0.042; week 24: P= 0.029) while nelfinavir-treated children took 24 weeks to reach such an outcome (P=0.034). Since lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen controls viral replication more efficiently and restores CD4+ T-lymphocyte count more quickly than saquinavir- or nelfinavir-based HAART, it may be considered when a salvage therapy or a rapid increase in CD4+ T-lymphocytes is necessary.
Similar articles
-
Long-term safety and effectiveness of ritonavir, nelfinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected children.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 May;27(5):431-7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181646d5a. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008. PMID: 18382386
-
Lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir for the initial treatment of HIV infection.N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 27;346(26):2039-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012354. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12087139 Clinical Trial.
-
Liver injury and changes in hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA load associated with protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naive HCV-HIV-coinfected patients: lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir.Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Oct 15;41(8):1186-95. doi: 10.1086/444501. Epub 2005 Sep 13. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 16163639 Clinical Trial.
-
Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.Drugs. 2003;63(8):769-802. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00004. Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12662125 Review.
-
Efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected children.Lancet Infect Dis. 2002 Feb;2(2):93-102. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00183-4. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002. PMID: 11901656 Review.
Cited by
-
High virologic response rate after second-line boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy regimens in children from a resource limited setting.AIDS Res Ther. 2012 Jun 18;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-9-20. AIDS Res Ther. 2012. PMID: 22709957 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of pediatric HIV infection.Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007 Sep;9(5):425-33. doi: 10.1007/s11908-007-0065-5. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007. PMID: 17880854
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous