A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor
- PMID: 16389004
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.022
A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare obstetrical outcomes associated with coached versus uncoached pushing during the second stage of labor.
Study design: Upon reaching the second stage, previously consented nulliparous women with uncomplicated labors and without epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to coached (n = 163) versus uncoached (n = 157) pushing. Women allocated to coaching received standardized closed glottis pushing instructions by certified nurse-midwives with proper ventilation encouraged between contractions. These midwives also attended those women assigned to no coaching to ensure that any expulsive efforts were involuntary.
Results: The second stage of labor was abbreviated by approximately 13 minutes in coached women (P = .01). There were no other clinically significant immediate maternal or neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Although associated with a slightly shorter second stage, coached maternal pushing confers no other advantages and withholding such coaching is not harmful.
Comment in
-
Is there any evidence for noncoached pushing in women with epidurals?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):e5; author reply e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.054. Epub 2006 Apr 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16584703 No abstract available.
-
Randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing in the second stage of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;196(1):e34; author reply e34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.028. Epub 2006 Jul 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 16824471 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical