Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 May;14(2):165-73.
doi: 10.1007/BF01219108.

A comparison of methods for sampling the deer tick, Ixodes dammini, in a Lyme disease endemic area

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of methods for sampling the deer tick, Ixodes dammini, in a Lyme disease endemic area

R C Falco et al. Exp Appl Acarol. 1992 May.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the trapping and examining of mice, drag sampling, and CO2-baited traps for their ability to detect the presence and abundance of immature deer ticks, Ixodes dammini, in a Lyme disease endemic area in southern New York State. Eight study sites were sampled 14 times between 28 May and 31 August by setting 49 live-traps, four CO2-baited traps, and drag sampling 500 m2. A total of 1540 nymphs and 3079 larvae was collected during the study. Drag sampling collected the most nymphs (705), while more larvae were recovered from CO2-baited traps (1105). Comparisons among the methods showed a significant difference in the numbers of both larval and nymphal ticks collected (P less than 0.01). There was a positive correlation between the numbers of nymphs collected by drag sampling and CO2-baited tick traps (rs = 0.83, P less than 0.05), and between the numbers of larvae collected by drag sampling and mouse trapping (rs = 0.75, P less than 0.05). These results suggest that drag sampling would be the single most reliable method for quantitatively sampling immature I. dammini populations in a Lyme disease endemic area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Med Entomol. 1985 Jul 26;22(4):408-14 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jan;76(1):62-5 - PubMed
    1. J Wildl Dis. 1986 Apr;22(2):178-88 - PubMed
    1. J Med Entomol. 1989 May;26(3):200-9 - PubMed
    1. J Wildl Dis. 1990 Jan;26(1):1-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources