Conducting research in general practice: lessons learnt from experience
- PMID: 16389929
- DOI: 10.1071/he05041
Conducting research in general practice: lessons learnt from experience
Abstract
Issue addressed: The increased focus on evidence-based practice and the World Health Organization (WHO) settings approach to health promotion have contributed to an increase in the importance of health promotion activity and therefore research being undertaken in the general practice setting. Primary care-based trials represent major investments in time and resources for researchers, health professionals and patients, and there are several methodological and logistical issues that need to be considered. The costs of failed trials are potentially significant and include wasted resources, opportunity costs of participants' time and discouragement of primary care professionals from co-operating with further research.
Discussion: This paper presents an overview of the important logistical and methodological considerations when conducting research in this setting. This paper is written for researchers new to the general practice setting. We discuss logistical challenges such as literature searching, ethical considerations, recruitment and retention of GPs, practices and patients, working with practices, and financial considerations. Methodological considerations including issues relating to patient recruitment, clustering, Hawthorne effect, ensuring conformity of intervention, avoiding contamination, and confounders are also discussed. A checklist for researchers contemplating research in this setting is supplied.
Similar articles
-
Barriers to recruitment of professionals into a general practice childhood obesity program.Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(2):156-61. doi: 10.1071/PY10017. Aust J Prim Health. 2011. PMID: 21645471
-
Development and oversight of ethical health promotion quality assurance and evaluation activities involving human participants.Health Promot J Austr. 2015 Dec;26(3):176-181. doi: 10.1071/HE15045. Health Promot J Austr. 2015. PMID: 26536392 Review.
-
Implementing Kanyini GAP, a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Australia: findings from a qualitative study.Trials. 2015 Sep 23;16:425. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0956-y. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26399503 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
What role can the rural pipeline play in the recruitment and retention of rural allied health professionals?Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3438. Epub 2015 Aug 20. Rural Remote Health. 2015. PMID: 26290155
-
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15694064 Review.
Cited by
-
Process evaluation of recruitment for a cancer screening trial in primary care.Health Promot Pract. 2011 Sep;12(5):696-703. doi: 10.1177/1524839910366402. Epub 2011 Apr 6. Health Promot Pract. 2011. PMID: 21471439 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes, Behaviors, and Perceived Barriers Toward Conducting Research Among Preventive Medicine Residents in Saudi Arabia: A National Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus. 2025 Jul 19;17(7):e88303. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88303. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40687414 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of GP referral of insufficiently active patients for expert physical activity counseling: protocol for a pragmatic randomized trial (The NewCOACH trial).BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Dec 29;15:218. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0218-1. BMC Fam Pract. 2014. PMID: 25543688 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving survey response rates from parents in school-based research using a multi-level approach.PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0126950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126950. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25961851 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources