Managing 'suspicious glaucomatous discs' identified during digital-photography-based diabetic retinopathy screening
- PMID: 16390478
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00361.x
Managing 'suspicious glaucomatous discs' identified during digital-photography-based diabetic retinopathy screening
Abstract
Purpose: An audit to demonstrate the outcome of patients identified with suspicious glaucomatous discs within a digital-photography-based diabetic retinopathy screening programme.
Methods: Primary care based digital photographic screening was performed utilising mydriasis and two-field digital photography for all patients with diabetes. Patients identified with discs suspicious of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) were initially referred to an accredited community-based optometrist for further assessment. Some patients were then referred to secondary care where appropriate.
Results: From 1st April 2002 to 31st March 2003 a total of 3868 patients were screened for diabetic retinopathy. This audit revealed that 55 subjects were identified by retinal screeners as having discs suspicious of glaucoma. A total of 29 were already under glaucoma clinic review. A total of 23/26 remaining were referred for an assessment by an accredited optometrist. Of these 13 were normal, 6 were referred to secondary care and 4 failed to attend. The three remaining were referred directly to secondary care.
Conclusions: All nine referrals to secondary care were deemed appropriate by a glaucoma specialist. This suggests that the system described does not lead to over-referral of suspicious discs - although the issue of how many glaucomatous discs are missed during screening (false negatives) will only be answered in the longer term.
Similar articles
-
Glaucoma detection using optic disc images from the English national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy.J Glaucoma. 2013 Aug;22(6):496-500. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182447d58. J Glaucoma. 2013. PMID: 22274671
-
Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district.Eye (Lond). 2004 Jan;18(1):3-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700497. Eye (Lond). 2004. PMID: 14707956
-
Diabetes-associated retinal nerve fiber damage evaluated with scanning laser polarimetry.Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;142(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.016. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 16815255
-
New findings in the evaluation of the optic disc in glaucoma diagnosis.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328040bfe0. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17301613 Review.
-
Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.Ophthalmology. 2004 May;111(5):1055-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.004. Ophthalmology. 2004. PMID: 15121388 Review.
Cited by
-
Relative Importance of Glaucoma-Referral Indicators in Retinal Images in a Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme in Slovenia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 9;59(8):1441. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081441. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37629731 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucoma in Diabetic Patients.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:892174. doi: 10.1155/2015/892174. Epub 2015 Oct 18. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26557709 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the outcome of screening for glaucoma using colour fundus photography-based referral criteria in a teleophthalmology screening programme for diabetic retinopathy.Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 20;108(7):933-939. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323339. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 37852739 Free PMC article.
-
Differential response of C57BL/6J mouse and DBA/2J mouse to optic nerve crush.BMC Neurosci. 2009 Jul 30;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-90. BMC Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19643015 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous