Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts
- PMID: 16391192
Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts
Abstract
We investigated the effect of CT truncation in whole-body (WB) PET/CT imaging of large patients, and we evaluated the efficacy of an extended field-of-view (eFOV) correction technique.
Methods: Two uniform phantoms simulating a "torso" and an "arms-up" setup were filled with (18)F-FDG/water. A third, nonuniform "body phantom was prepared with hot and cold lesions. All 3 phantoms were positioned in the center of the PET/CT gantry with >or=10% of their volume extending beyond the maximum CT FOV. An eFOV algorithm was used to estimate complete CT projections from nonlinear extrapolation of the truncated projections. CT-based attenuation correction (CT AC) of the phantom data was performed using CT images reconstructed from truncated and extended projections. For clinical validation, we processed truncated datasets from 10 PET/CT patients with and without eFOV correction.
Results: When using truncated CT images for CT AC, PET tracer distribution was suppressed outside the transverse CT FOV in phantom and patient studies. PET activity concentration in the truncated regions was only 10%-32% of the true value but increased to 84%-100% when using the extended CT images for CT AC. At the same time, the contour of phantoms and patients was recovered to the anatomically correct shape from the uncorrected emission images, and the apparent distortion of lesions near the maximum CT FOV was reduced.
Conclusion: Truncation artifacts in WB PET/CT led to visual and quantitative distortions of the CT and attenuation-corrected PET images in the area of truncation. These artifacts can be corrected to improve the accuracy of PET/CT for diagnosis and therapy response evaluation.
Similar articles
-
Truncation artifact on PET/CT: impact on measurements of activity concentration and assessment of a correction algorithm.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1458-67. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0255. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006. PMID: 16632745
-
Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data.J Nucl Med. 2009 Apr;50(4):520-6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054726. Epub 2009 Mar 16. J Nucl Med. 2009. PMID: 19289430
-
Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.J Nucl Med. 2005 May;46(5):868-77. J Nucl Med. 2005. PMID: 15872362 Clinical Trial.
-
X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.Semin Nucl Med. 2003 Jul;33(3):166-79. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2003.127307. Semin Nucl Med. 2003. PMID: 12931319 Review.
-
Integrating PET and PET/CT into the risk-adapted therapy of lymphoma.J Nucl Med. 2007 Jan;48 Suppl 1:19S-27S. J Nucl Med. 2007. PMID: 17204717 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of patient arm motion in whole-body PET/CT.J Nucl Med. 2011 Dec;52(12):1891-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093583. Epub 2011 Nov 11. J Nucl Med. 2011. PMID: 22080444 Free PMC article.
-
Morphology supporting function: attenuation correction for SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging.Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Mar;60(1):25-39. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26576737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.Semin Nucl Med. 2021 Nov;51(6):646-656. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Semin Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 34243906 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR.MAGMA. 2013 Feb;26(1):81-98. doi: 10.1007/s10334-012-0334-7. Epub 2012 Aug 9. MAGMA. 2013. PMID: 22875599 Review.
-
Multi-modality nuclear medicine imaging: artefacts, pitfalls and recommendations.Cancer Imaging. 2007 May 28;7(1):77-83. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0014. Cancer Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17535775 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical