[Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration]
- PMID: 16392302
[Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration]
Abstract
Until now, with the ionic dialysance measurement, it has been possible to determine hemodialysis dose in each session of hemodialysis (HD) and in the conventional hemofiltration (HDF) but not in the modality of on-line HDF. Recently it is possible with a new biosensor that allows to measure the dose in on-line HDF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of this biosensor in different dialysis situations comparing the dialysis dose measured in blood in comparison with the values obtained from the sensor. We have analysed 192 hemodialysis sessions performed in 24 patients, 15 male and 9 female, mean age of 70.2 +/- 12 years, included in on-line HDF. All treatments were done using 4008H (Fresenius) monitor equipped with on-line clearance monitoring (OCM), that measure, with non invasive monitoring, the effective ionic dialysance equivalent to urea clearance. Every patient received eight dialysis sessions: one with dialysate flow (Qd) 500 ml/min, two with HD and Qd 800 ml/min and five with on-line HDF. Other habitual haemodialysis parameters were no changed, dialysis time 200 +/- 63 min (135-300) and blood flow 421 +/- 29 ml/min (350-450). Initial and final ionic dialysance values (K), final Kt, Kt/V measured with OCM using V of Watson, and Kt/V determined in blood pre and postdialysis concentrations of urea (Daugirdas second generation), were measured. The mean of initial K was 251 +/- 21 ml/min and the final K was 234 +/- 24 ml/min. The Kt measured with OCM was 50.6 +/- 17 L, 51.2 +/- 17 in men and 49.7 +/- 16 in women. The V (Watson) was 34.5 +/- 6 L. The Kt/V measured with the Kt of OCM and V was 1,499 +/- 0.54 and Kt/V measured in blood samples was 1,742 +/- 0.58. The correlation between both values was 0.956. The Kt was different according to dialysis modality used: in HD and Qd 500 was 44.7 +/- 15 L, in HD and Qd 800 was 50.7 +/- 17 and in on-line HDF (22.1 +/- 7 L of reposition volume), was 51.8 +/- 17 L. The Kt/V from blood samples also shows variation: in HD and QD 500 was 1.60 +/- 0.55, in HD and Qd 800 was 1,726 +/- 0.56 and in on-line HDF was 1,776 +/- 0.59. In this study has been observed a close correlation between the new biosensor OCM with the measures obtained from the blood samples. For this reason this sensor it is useful in all modalities of dialysis treatment, included on-line HDF. The sensor was able to discriminate the efficacy of different dialysis modalities used in this study.
Similar articles
-
Influence of the ionic dialysance monitor on Kt measurement in hemodialysis.Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jul;52(1):85-92. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 May 2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008. PMID: 18455852
-
Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Aug;21(8):2225-31. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl147. Epub 2006 Apr 12. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006. PMID: 16611681
-
A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Jan;24(1):211-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn457. Epub 2008 Aug 12. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009. PMID: 18697799
-
[Ionic dialysance and quality control in hemodialysis].Nephrologie. 2001;22(5):191-7. Nephrologie. 2001. PMID: 11572165 Review. French.
-
Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Jan;20(1):22-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh555. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005. PMID: 15632348 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of hemodialysis urea clearance using spent dialysate and Kt/Vurea equations.Artif Organs. 2025 Jan;49(1):85-92. doi: 10.1111/aor.14848. Epub 2024 Aug 23. Artif Organs. 2025. PMID: 39177022 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources